The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 338:1927 June 25, 1998 Number 26
NextNext

More on Varicella Immunization

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: The letter by Spingarn and Benjamin and the reply by Meissner (March 5 issue)1,2 highlight problems with the discussion about the merits of universal varicella immunization. All parties agree that the vaccine is safe and effective and that nonimmune adults and high-risk children require immunization. Beyond that, both sides expend considerable energy talking past one another. For example, with regard to the morbidity and mortality associated with varicella, the authors cite the same statistics to support opposite claims: that childhood varicella infection does or does not merit a universal immunization program. This "yes, it is" "no, it . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


Related Letters:

Universal Vaccination against Varicella
Spingarn R. W., Benjamin J. A., Meissner H. C.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1998; 338:683-684, Mar 5, 1998. Correspondence



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.