The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 339:1441-1447 November 12, 1998 Number 20
NextNext

The Fall and Rise of Carotid Endarterectomy in the United States and Canada
Jack V. Tu, M.D., Ph.D., Edward L. Hannan, Ph.D., Geoffrey M. Anderson, M.D., Ph.D., Karey Iron, M.H.Sc., Keyi Wu, M.Sc., Karen Vranizan, M.A., A. John Popp, M.D., and Kevin Grumbach, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Chassin, M. R.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of carotid endarterectomy in the prevention of stroke when the procedure is performed in regional centers of surgical excellence. However, the relative effects of these studies on the rates of carotid endarterectomy in the United States and Canada have been unclear.

Methods We calculated the annual rate of carotid endarterectomy in the U.S. states of California and New York and in the Canadian province of Ontario from 1983 through 1995. We also studied whether patients in the early 1990s were selectively referred to hospitals with high volumes of procedures and historically low in-hospital mortality rates.

Results Rates of carotid endarterectomy fell in all three regions from 1984 to 1989 (from 126 to 66 per 100,000 adults 40 years of age or older in California, from 65 to 40 per 100,000 in New York, and from 40 to 15 per 100,000 in Ontario), after the publication of studies demonstrating that the rates of complications of carotid endarterectomy were unacceptably high. However, the clinical trials of the 1990s, which showed benefit from carotid endarterectomy, were associated with a dramatic resurgence in the rates of the procedure from 1989 to 1995 (from 66 to 99 per 100,000 in California, from 40 to 96 per 100,000 in New York, and from 15 to 38 per 100,000 in Ontario). These increased rates were not associated with proportionally greater numbers of referrals of patients to hospitals with low mortality rates.

Conclusions There have been a dramatic fall and a rise in the rates of carotid endarterectomy in both the United States and Canada, which correlate with the publication of first unfavorable and then favorable clinical studies. The absence of selective referral of patients to centers with the lowest mortality rates raises questions about whether the benefits of carotid endarterectomy in the general population are similar to those demonstrated in the clinical trials.


Source Information

From the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto (J.V.T., G.M.A., K.I., K.W.); the Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (J.V.T.), and the Department of Health Administration (G.M.A.), University of Toronto, Toronto; the State University of New York at Albany, Albany (E.L.H.); the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco (K.V., K.G.); and the Department of Surgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, N.Y. (A.J.P.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Tu at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, G106-2075 Bayview Ave., Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Carotid Endarterectomy
Goldstein L. B., Saver J. L., Elkins J. S., Shekelle P. G., Park R.E., Chassin M. R., Haynes R. B., Barnett H. J.M., Taylor D. W., Tu J. V.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1999; 340:1209-1212, Apr 15, 1999. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.