The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Sounding Board
PreviousPrevious
Volume 339:1705-1708 December 3, 1998 Number 23
NextNext

New Guidelines for Coding Physicians' Services — A Step Backward

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Kassirer, J. P.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
In July 1998, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) intended to implement a revised and more complex set of guidelines specifying how physicians should code and document "evaluation and management" services billed to Medicare. These services include office visits and hospital visits and are distinguished from surgery and other invasive procedures. In 1996, Medicare payments for evaluation and management services totaled about $16 billion, or 40 percent of payments to physicians under the program.1

Before the proposed date of implementation, the new guidelines created considerable turmoil among practicing physicians and were a subject of spirited and sometimes angry commentary in . . . [Full Text of this Article]

A Brief History of Evaluation and Management Guidelines

An Overview of the Proposed Guidelines

Four Arguments against the Guidelines

The Guidelines and Clinical Reasoning

Documentation and the Medical Record

Fair Compensation for Clinical Effort

Fraud and Abuse

Conclusions

References


Related Letters:

Evaluation and Management Guidelines
Berenson R. A., Field M. H., Ashcraft M., Wetzler H. P., Loudermilk A., Maddock R. K., Kassirer J. P., Angell M.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 1999; 340:889-891, Mar 18, 1999. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.