The political debate over abortion during the past 25 yearshas shifted among various dichotomous views of the world: lifeversus choice, fetus versus woman, fetus versus baby, constitutionalright versus states' rights, government versus physician, physicianand patient versus state legislature. Hundreds of statutes andalmost two dozen Supreme Court decisions on abortion later,the core aspects of Roe v. Wade,1 the most controversial health-relateddecision by the Court ever, remain substantially the same asthey were in 1973. Attempts to overturn Roe in both the courtroomand the legislature have failed. Pregnant women still have aconstitutional right . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Roe and Casey
Partial-Birth Abortion in Congress
Medical Practice and Medical Politics
Government Regulation of Medical Procedures
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
Annas, G. J.
(2007). The Supreme Court and Abortion Rights. NEJM
356: 2201-2207
[Full Text]
Annas, G. J.
(2001). "Partial-Birth Abortion" and the Supreme Court. NEJM
344: 152-156
[Full Text]
Eapen, S., Bulfin, M. J., Shale, J. H., Wingert, G. M., Grimes, D. A.
(2000). Abortion and Unplanned Pregnancy. JAMA
283: 1565-1567
[Full Text]
Grimes, D. A.
(1999). A 26-Year-Old Woman Seeking an Abortion. JAMA
282: 1169-1175
[Full Text]
Benshoof, J., Hodgson, J. E., Richmond, J. B., Lauster, M., Spear, S. J., Cronbach, E. J., Stanley, J. M., Floren, A. E., Grimes, D. A., Sprang, M. L., Neerhof, M. G., Gans Epner, J. E.
(1999). The Law, the AMA, and Partial-Birth Abortion. JAMA
282: 23-27
[Full Text]