FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 341:1980-1985 December 23, 1999 Number 26 Next

	Full Text PDF Editorial by Grumbach, K. Letters Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background Strategies to control medical costs and improve the quality of care often translate into decisions affecting the range of services primary care physicians provide to patients, which patients are referred for specialty care, and the points in disease processes at which referrals are made. This study focused on physicians' assessments of changes in the scope of care provided by primary care physicians and their assessments of the appropriateness of the scope of the care that primary care physicians are expected to provide.

Methods We analyzed data from the 1996–1997 Community Tracking Study Physician Survey. Telephone interviews were conducted with 12,385 physicians (reflecting a response rate of 65 percent) who were drawn from a representative random sample of physicians providing direct patient care in the continental United States and not employed by the federal government. The analysis was based on responses from the 7015 primary care physicians and 5092 specialists who had been in practice for at least two years.

Results Thirty percent of the primary care physicians and 50 percent of the specialists reported that the scope of care provided by primary care physicians had increased during the previous two years. Twenty-four percent of the primary care physicians and 38 percent of the specialists reported that the scope of care expected to be provided by primary care physicians was greater than it should be. According to multivariate analysis, primary care physicians other than general or family practitioners (i.e., pediatricians and general internists), those who were in one- or two-physician practices, those who received revenues from capitation, and those who served as gatekeepers for their patients' care were significantly more likely to report that the scope of care they were expected to provide was greater than it should be.

Conclusions The finding that nearly one in four primary care physicians reported that the scope of care they were expected to provide was greater than it should be arouses concern about the potential impact of changes in the delivery of health care. The associations we found between financial and administrative aspects of managed care and physicians' concern about the scope of care they provide to their patients deserve careful consideration.

Source Information

From the Kansas Health Institute, Topeka (R.F.S.); the Center for Studying Health System Change, Washington, D.C. (M.C.R., P.K.); and the Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital–Partners HealthCare System and the Departments of Medicine and Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (D.B.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. St. Peter at Kansas Health Institute, 100 S.E. Ninth St., Third Fl., Topeka, KS 66612-1212, or at rstpeter{at}khi.org.

Full Text of this Article

Related Letters:

The Scope of Practice in Primary Care
Buxeda M., Shepard M. A., Hensel W. A., St. Peter R. F., Reed M. C., Kemper P., Grumbach K.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1453-1454, May 11, 2000. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Sirovich, B. E., Gottlieb, D. J., Welch, H. G., Fisher, E. S. (2006). Regional Variations in Health Care Intensity and Physician Perceptions of Quality of Care. ANN INTERN MED 144: 641-649 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kutner, J. S., Westfall, J. M., Morrison, E. H., Beach, M. C., Jacobs, E. A., Rosenblatt, R. A. (2006). Facilitating Collaboration Among Academic Generalist Disciplines: A Call to Action. Ann Fam Med 4: 172-176 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wilson, T., Roland, M., Ham, C. (2006). The contribution of general practice and the general practitioner to NHS patients. JRSM 99: 24-28 [Full Text]  
• Linz, A. J., Haas, P. F., Fallon, L. F. Jr, Metz, R. J. (2005). Impact of Concierge Care on Healthcare and Clinical Practice. JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 105: 515-520 [Full Text]  
• Sirovich, B. E., Gottlieb, D. J., Welch, H. G., Fisher, E. S. (2005). Variation in the Tendency of Primary Care Physicians to Intervene. Arch Intern Med 165: 2252-2256 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Conrad, D. A., Christianson, J. B. (2004). Penetrating the "Black Box": Financial Incentives for Enhancing the Quality of Physician Services. Med Care Res Rev 61: 37S-68S [Abstract]  
• Bach, P. B., Pham, H. H., Schrag, D., Tate, R. C., Hargraves, J. L. (2004). Primary Care Physicians Who Treat Blacks and Whites. NEJM 351: 575-584 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Laposata, M. (2004). Patient-specific Narrative Interpretations of Complex Clinical Laboratory Evaluations: Who Is Competent to Provide Them?. Clin. Chem. 50: 471-472 [Full Text]  
• Forrest, C. B. (2004). Counting Child Health Care Professionals: Will the United States Ever Have a Coherent Workforce Policy for Children's Health Care?. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 158: 13-14 [Full Text]  
• Sierles, F. S., Yager, J., Weissman, S. H. (2003). Recruitment of U.S. Medical Graduates Into Psychiatry: Reasons for Optimism, Sources of Concern. Acad. Psychiatry 27: 252-259 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mechanic, D. (2003). Physician Discontent: Challenges and Opportunities. JAMA 290: 941-946 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bodenheimer, T., Majeed, A., Bindman, A. B (2003). Primary care in the United States: Innovations in primary care in the United States * Commentary: What can primary care in the United States learn from the United Kingdom?. BMJ 326: 796-799 [Full Text]  
• Bindman, A. B, Majeed, A. (2003). Primary care in the United States: Organisation of primary care in the United States. BMJ 326: 631-634 [Full Text]  
• Ferris, T. G., Wasserman, R. C. (2003). Primary Care and Specialty Care for US Children: What Is the Right Mix?. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157: 219-220 [Full Text]  
• Ginsburg, P. B. (2003). Payment and the Future of Primary Care. ANN INTERN MED 138: 233-234 [Full Text]  
• Landon, B. E., Reschovsky, J., Blumenthal, D. (2003). Changes in Career Satisfaction Among Primary Care and Specialist Physicians, 1997-2001. JAMA 289: 442-449 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Leigh, J. P., Kravitz, R. L., Schembri, M., Samuels, S. J., Mobley, S. (2002). Physician Career Satisfaction Across Specialties. Arch Intern Med 162: 1577-1584 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Weingarten, S. R., Lloyd, L., Chiou, C.-F., Braunstein, G. D. (2002). Do Subspecialists Working Outside of Their Specialty Provide Less Efficient and Lower-Quality Care to Hospitalized Patients Than Do Primary Care Physicians?. Arch Intern Med 162: 527-532 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sandvik, H., Cho, H.-J. (2002). Attitudes to family practice registration programmes. Survey of Korean and Norwegian family doctors. Fam Pract 19: 72-76 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Foster, N. L. (2001). Barriers to Treatment: The Unique Challenges for Physicians Providing Dementia Care. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 14: 188-198 [Abstract]  
• Stevens, D. P., Holland, G. J., Kizer, K. W. (2001). Results of a Nationwide Veterans Affairs Initiative to Align Graduate Medical Education and Patient Care. JAMA 286: 1061-1066 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Campion, E. W. (2001). A Symptom of Discontent. NEJM 344: 223-225 [Full Text]  
• Samet, J. H., Friedmann, P., Saitz, R. (2001). Benefits of Linking Primary Medical Care and Substance Abuse Services: Patient, Provider, and Societal Perspectives. Arch Intern Med 161: 85-91 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Barondess, J. A. (2000). Specialization and the Physician Workforce: Drivers and Determinants. JAMA 284: 1299-1301 [Full Text]  
• Buxeda, M., Shepard, M. A., Hensel, W. A., St. Peter, R. F., Reed, M. C., Kemper, P., Grumbach, K. (2000). The Scope of Practice in Primary Care. NEJM 342: 1453-1454 [Full Text]  
• Grumbach, K. (1999). Primary Care in the United States -- The Best of Times, the Worst of Times. NEJM 341: 2008-2010 [Full Text]