The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
A correction has been published: N Engl J Med 1999;341(15):1164.

Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 341:365-367 July 29, 1999 Number 5
NextNext

The Demand for Documentation for Medicare Payment

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
-Related Article
 by Lasker, R. D.
-PubMed Citation
Sometime in 1998, as ably chronicled by Brett,1 a long-simmering disagreement over an arcane administrative construct — documentation guidelines for physicians to use in coding evaluation and management services billed to Medicare — was transformed into a pitched battle. Before long, the struggle deteriorated into high melodrama.1,2 Against the backdrop of several nationally publicized cases of fraudulent billing, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) drew the battle lines, backed by federal regulatory, investigative, and punitive clout. Taking the rhetorical high road, HCFA aimed to protect the public purse against avaricious doctors bent on waste, fraud, and abuse.

Along with its . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.