The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 342:737-739 March 9, 2000 Number 10
NextNext

Virtual Colonoscopy

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Bond, J. H.
-Related Article
 by Fenlon, H. M.
To the Editor: Like Fenlon et al. (Nov. 11 issue),1 we undertook a prospective study to establish the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of virtual colonoscopy. Of 25 patients (median age, 71 years) with large-bowel symptoms (mainly rectal bleeding) who underwent virtual colonoscopy and then conventional colonoscopy immediately afterward (complete to the cecum in 24 patients), 5 had a polyp or cancer larger than 10 mm (range, 10 to 50), and 1 had an amyloid deposit. Only one of these lesions was identified with virtual colonoscopy. Four patients had false positive findings of polyps (polyp size, 6 to 40 mm); in . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References




HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.