The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 342:78-82 January 13, 2000 Number 2
NextNext

Urgent Colonoscopy for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Diverticular Hemorrhage
Dennis M. Jensen, M.D., Gustavo A. Machicado, M.D., Rome Jutabha, M.D., and Thomas O.G. Kovacs, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Gostout, C. J.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Although endoscopy is often used to diagnose and treat acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, its role in the management of diverticulosis and lower gastrointestinal bleeding is uncertain.

Methods We studied the role of urgent colonoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of 121 patients with severe hematochezia and diverticulosis. All patients were hospitalized, received blood transfusions as needed, and received a purge to rid the colon of clots, stool, and blood. Colonoscopy was performed within 6 to 12 hours after hospitalization or the diagnosis of hematochezia. Among the first 73 patients, those with continued diverticular bleeding underwent hemicolectomy. For the subsequent 48 patients, those requiring treatment received therapy, such as epinephrine injections or bipolar coagulation, through the colonoscope.

Results Of the first 73 patients, 17 (23 percent) had definite signs of diverticular hemorrhage (active bleeding in 6, nonbleeding visible vessels in 4, and adherent clots in 7). Nine of the 17 had additional bleeding after colonoscopy, and 6 of these required hemicolectomy. Of the subsequent 48 patients, 10 (21 percent) had definite signs of diverticular hemorrhage (active bleeding in 5, nonbleeding visible vessels in 2, and adherent clots in 3). An additional 14 patients in this group (29 percent) were presumed to have diverticular bleeding because although they had no stigmata of diverticular hemorrhage, no other source of bleeding was identified. The other 24 patients (50 percent) had other identified sources of bleeding. All 10 patients with definite diverticular hemorrhage were treated endoscopically; none had recurrent bleeding or required surgery.

Conclusions Among patients with severe hematochezia and diverticulosis, at least one fifth have definite diverticular hemorrhage. Colonoscopic treatment of such patients with epinephrine injections, bipolar coagulation, or both may prevent recurrent bleeding and decrease the need for surgery.


Source Information

From the Center for Ulcer Research and Education (CURE) Hemostasis Research Unit, Digestive Disease Research Center, Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California at Los Angeles Center for the Health Sciences, and the Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Jensen at CURE, Digestive Disease Research Center, VA GLAHS, 11301 Wilshire Blvd., Bldg. 115, Rm. 318, Los Angeles, CA 90073-1003, or at djensen{at}med1.medsch.ucla.edu.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Urgent Colonoscopy for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Severe Diverticular Hemorrhage
Bloomfeld R. S., Shetzline M., Rockey D., Farivar M., Perrotto J. L., McGuire H. H., Sehgal M., Farner M. C., Funaki B., Leef J. A., Zaleski G. X., Frossard J. L., Spahr L., de Peyer R., Jensen D. M., Machicado G. A.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1608-1611, May 25, 2000. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.