The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 342:1471-1477 May 18, 2000 Number 20
NextNext

Daily Interruption of Sedative Infusions in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation
John P. Kress, M.D., Anne S. Pohlman, R.N., Michael F. O'Connor, M.D., and Jesse B. Hall, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Heffner, J. E.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Continuous infusions of sedative drugs in the intensive care unit may prolong the duration of mechanical ventilation, prolong the length of stay in the intensive care unit and the hospital, impede efforts to perform daily neurologic examinations, and increase the need for tests to assess alterations in mental status. Whether regular interruption of such infusions might accelerate recovery is not known.

Methods We conducted a randomized, controlled trial involving 128 adult patients who were receiving mechanical ventilation and continuous infusions of sedative drugs in a medical intensive care unit. In the intervention group, the sedative infusions were interrupted until the patients were awake, on a daily basis; in the control group, the infusions were interrupted only at the discretion of the clinicians in the intensive care unit.

Results The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 4.9 days in the intervention group, as compared with 7.3 days in the control group (P=0.004), and the median length of stay in the intensive care unit was 6.4 days as compared with 9.9 days, respectively (P=0.02). Six of the patients in the intervention group (9 percent) underwent diagnostic testing to assess changes in mental status, as compared with 16 of the patients in the control group (27 percent, P=0.02). Complications (e.g., removal of the endotracheal tube by the patient) occurred in three of the patients in the intervention group (4 percent) and four of the patients in the control group (7 percent, P=0.88).

Conclusions In patients who are receiving mechanical ventilation, daily interruption of sedative-drug infusions decreases the duration of mechanical ventilation and the length of stay in the intensive care unit.


Source Information

From the Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care (J.P.K., A.S.P., J.B.H.), and the Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care (M.F.O., J.B.H.), University of Chicago, Chicago.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Hall at the University of Chicago, Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, MC 6026, Chicago IL 60637, or at jhall{at}medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Daily Interruption of Sedative Infusions in Critically Ill Patients
Hong J. J., Mazuski J. E., Shapiro M. J., Riker R. R., Fraser G. L., Kress J. P., Hall J. B.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 2000; 343:814-815, Sep 14, 2000. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.