The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 342:1907-1909 June 22, 2000 Number 25
NextNext

Randomized Trials or Observational Tribulations?

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Benson, K.
-Related Article
 by Concato, J.
-PubMed Citation
The role of observational studies in the evaluation of treatments is a long-standing and contentious topic.1 In this issue of the Journal, Concato et al.2 and Benson and Hartz3 report that observational studies give results similar to those of randomized, controlled trials. If these claims lead to more observational studies of therapeutic interventions and fewer randomized, controlled trials, we see considerable dangers to clinical research and even to the well-being of patients.

Any systematic review of evidence on a therapeutic topic needs to take into account the quality of the evidence. Any study, whether randomized or observational, may have flaws . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


Related Letters:

Observational Studies and Randomized Trials
Kunz R., Khan K. S., Neumayer H.-H., Sacks H. S., Liu P.-Y., Anderson G., Crowley J. J., Friedman H. S., Smith R. P., Meier P., Benson K., Hartz A. J., Concato J., Shah N., Horwitz R. I.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 2000; 343:1194-1197, Oct 19, 2000. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.