FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 342:250-255 January 27, 2000 Number 4 Next

	Full Text PDF Letters Letters Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background Previous studies have demonstrated that a small number of the 125 medical schools in the United States receive a disproportionately large share of the research awards granted by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). We assessed whether the distribution of NIH research awards to medical schools changed between 1986 and 1997.

Methods We used NIH data to rank medical schools in each year from 1986 to 1997 according to the number of awards each school received (as a measure of each school's activity in research, also referred to as research intensity). The proportion of awards received by schools ranked 1 to 10, 11 to 30, 31 to 50, and 51 or lower in research activity was then calculated, and changes over time were examined. We also examined changes in the distribution of awards and changes in award amounts according to the type of department, the type of academic degree held by the principal investigator, and the awarding institute.

Results Between 1986 and 1997, the proportion of research awards granted by the NIH to the 10 most research-intensive medical schools increased slight-ly (from 24.6 percent of all awards to 27.1 percent), whereas the 75 least research-intensive medical schools (those ranked 51 or lower) received proportionately fewer awards (declining from 24.3 percent to 21.8 percent). The increased proportion of awards to top-10 schools consisted primarily of increases in awards to clinical departments, awards to physicians, and awards from highly competitive NIH institutes. Basic-science departments received a smaller proportion of awards than clinical departments, both in 1986 and in 1997.

Conclusions Research funded by the NIH is becoming more concentrated in the medical schools that are most active in research.

Source Information

From the Center for the Assessment and Management of Change in Academic Medicine, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, D.C. (E.M., P.F.G.); the Institute for Science and Health Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville (D.R.C.); and the Dean's Office, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill (D.R.P.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Moy at the Center for the Assessment and Management of Change in Academic Medicine, Association of American Medical Colleges, 2450 N St., NW, Washington, DC 20037, or at emoy{at}aamc.org.

Full Text of this Article

Related Letters:

Distribution of Research Awards from the National Institutes of Health among Medical Schools
Gibson M., Stanton B., Aron D. C., Aucott J. N., Papp K. K., Moy E., Griner P. F.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1753-1755, Jun 8, 2000. Correspondence

Is Academic Medicine for Sale?
Ross L. F., Norton J. W., Young S. A., Lebowitz J., Leong G. B., Silva J. A., Dillon D. C., Jagger J., Firlik A. D., Lowry D. W., Diamond C., Ruane T. J., Hagan B. M., Miller P. D., Angell M.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 2000; 343:508-510, Aug 17, 2000. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Bowman, M. A., Rubenstein, A. H., Levine, A. S. (2007). Clinical Revenue Investment in Biomedical Research: Lessons From Two Academic Medical Centers. JAMA 297: 2521-2524 [Full Text]  
• Rabinowitz, H. K., Becker, J. A., Gregory, N. D., Wender, R. C. (2006). NIH Funding in Family Medicine: An Analysis of 2003 Awards.. Ann Fam Med 4: 437-442 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mainous, A. G. III, Hueston, W. J., Ye, X., Bazell, C. (2000). A Comparison of Family Medicine Research in Research Intense and Less Intense Institutions. Arch Fam Med 9: 1100-1104 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ross, L. F., Norton, J. W., Young, S. A., Lebowitz, J., Leong, G. B., Silva, J. A., Dillon, D. C., Jagger, J., Firlik, A. D., Lowry, D. W., Diamond, C., Ruane, T. J., Hagan, B. M., Miller, P. D., Angell, M. (2000). Is Academic Medicine for Sale?. NEJM 343: 508-510 [Full Text]  
• Gibson, M., Stanton, B., Aron, D. C., Aucott, J. N., Papp, K. K., Moy, E., Griner, P. F. (2000). Distribution of Research Awards from the National Institutes of Health among Medical Schools. NEJM 342: 1753-1755 [Full Text]