FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 343:94-99 July 13, 2000 Number 2 Next

	Full Text PDF Editorial by Marx, J. A. Letters Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited Related Article PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background Because clinicians fear missing occult cervical-spine injuries, they obtain cervical radiographs for nearly all patients who present with blunt trauma. Previous research suggests that a set of clinical criteria (decision instrument) can identify patients who have an extremely low probability of injury and who consequently have no need for imaging studies.

Methods We conducted a prospective, observational study of such a decision instrument at 21 centers across the United States. The decision instrument required patients to meet five criteria in order to be classified as having a low probability of injury: no midline cervical tenderness, no focal neurologic deficit, normal alertness, no intoxication, and no painful, distracting injury. We examined the performance of the decision instrument in 34,069 patients who underwent radiography of the cervical spine after blunt trauma.

Results The decision instrument identified all but 8 of the 818 patients who had cervical-spine injury (sensitivity, 99.0 percent [95 percent confidence interval, 98.0 to 99.6 percent]). The negative predictive value was 99.8 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 99.6 to 100 percent), the specificity was 12.9 percent, and the positive predictive value was 2.7 percent. Only two of the patients classified as unlikely to have an injury according to the decision instrument met the preset definition of a clinically significant injury (sensitivity, 99.6 percent [95 percent confidence interval, 98.6 to 100 percent]; negative predictive value, 99.9 percent [95 percent confidence interval, 99.8 to 100 percent]; specificity, 12.9 percent; positive predictive value, 1.9 percent), and only one of these two patients received surgical treatment. According to the results of assessment with the decision instrument, radiographic imaging could have been avoided in the cases of 4309 (12.6 percent) of the 34,069 evaluated patients.

Conclusions A simple decision instrument based on clinical criteria can help physicians to identify reliably the patients who need radiography of the cervical spine after blunt trauma. Application of this instrument could reduce the use of imaging in such patients.

Source Information

From the Emergency Medicine Center and the Departments of Medicine (J.R.H., W.R.M., M.I.Z.) and Radiology (M.I.Z.), University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles; the Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh (A.B.W.); and the Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta (K.H.T.). Presented in part at the American College of Emergency Physicians Research Forum, San Diego, Calif., October 11, 1998, and at the National Scientific Assembly of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Boston, May 21, 1999.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Mower at the UCLA Emergency Medicine Center, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90024, or at nexusgrp{at}ucla.edu.

Full Text of this Article

Related Letters:

Clinical Criteria to Rule Out Cervical-Spine Injury
Krochmal P., April R. S., Lanfranchi R., Hoffman J. R., Mower W. R.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 2000; 343:1338-1339, Nov 2, 2000. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Wee, B., Reynolds, J. H, Bleetman, A. (2008). Imaging after trauma to the neck. BMJ 337: a207-a207 [Full Text]  
• Phal, P.M., Riccelli, L.P., Wang, P., Nesbit, G.M., Anderson, J.C. (2008). Fracture Detection in the Cervical Spine with Multidetector CT: 1-mm versus 3-mm Axial Images. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 29: 1446-1449 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Baskerville, J. R (2008). Screening patients with multi-detector computed axial tomography (MDCT): when will we inform patients about the risk of radiation?. Emerg. Med. J. 25: 323-324 [Full Text]  
• Wee, B., Reynolds, J. H, Bleetman, A. (2008). Imaging after trauma to the neck. BMJ 336: 154-157 [Full Text]  
• Mulkens, T.H., Marchal, P., Daineffe, S., Salgado, R., Bellinck, P., Rijdt, B. t., Kegelaers, B., Termote, J.-L. (2007). Comparison of Low-Dose With Standard-Dose Multidetector CT in Cervical Spine Trauma. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 28: 1444-1450 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Armstrong, B P, Simpson, H K, Crouch, R, Deakin, C D (2007). Prehospital clearance of the cervical spine: does it need to be a pain in the neck?. Emerg. Med. J. 24: 501-503 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pitt, E, Pedley, D K, Nelson, A, Cumming, M, Johnston, M (2006). Removal of C-spine protection by A&E triage nurses: a prospective trial of a clinical decision making instrument. Emerg. Med. J. 23: 214-215 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Reilly, B. M., Evans, A. T. (2006). Translating Clinical Research into Clinical Practice: Impact of Using Prediction Rules To Make Decisions. ANN INTERN MED 144: 201-209 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kwon, B. K., Vaccaro, A. R., Grauer, J. N., Fisher, C. G., Dvorak, M. F. (2006). Subaxial Cervical Spine Trauma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14: 78-89 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (2005). Part 14: First Aid. Circulation 112: IV-196-IV-203 [Full Text]  
• Barron, D (2005). Axial trauma. Imaging 17: 236-257 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• (2005). Part 10: First Aid. Circulation 112: III-115-III-125 [Full Text]  
• Schuster, R., Waxman, K., Sanchez, B., Becerra, S., Chung, R., Conner, S., Jones, T. (2005). Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Not Needed to Clear Cervical Spines in Blunt Trauma Patients With Normal Computed Tomographic Results and No Motor Deficits. Arch Surg 140: 762-766 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• D'Costa, H, George, G, Parry, M, Pullinger, R, Skinner, D, Thomas, S, Todd, B, Wilson, M (2005). Pitfalls in the clinical diagnosis of vertebral fractures: a case series in which posterior midline tenderness was absent. Emerg. Med. J. 22: 330-332 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Blackmore, C. C. (2005). Clinical Prediction Rules in Trauma Imaging: Who, How, and Why?. Radiology 235: 371-374 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Leigh-Smith, S, Price, R, Summers, D (2005). Atlas: standard diagnostic tests for an unusual fracture. Emerg. Med. J. 22: 225-226 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Blackmore, C. C., Cummings, P. (2004). Observational Studies in Radiology. Am. J. Roentgenol. 183: 1203-1208 [Full Text]  
• Douglass, A. B., Bope, E. T. (2004). Evaluation and Treatment of Posterior Neck Pain in Family Practice. J Am Board Fam Med 17: S13-S22 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Guly, H. (2004). Substance abuse and the trauma patient. Trauma 6: 205-210 [Abstract]  
• Waninger, K. N. (2004). Management of the Helmeted Athlete With Suspected Cervical Spine Injury. Am J Sports Med 32: 1331-1350 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mower, W. R., Wolfson, A. B., Hoffman, J. R., Todd, K. H., Hall, F. M., Stiell, I. G., Rowe, B. H., Lee, J. (2004). The Canadian C-Spine Rule. NEJM 350: 1467-1469 [Full Text]  
• Wardrope, J., Ravichandran, G, Locker, T. (2004). Risk assessment for spinal injury after trauma. BMJ 328: 721-723 [Full Text]  
• Slack, S E, Clancy, M J (2004). Clearing the cervical spine of paediatric trauma patients. Emerg. Med. J. 21: 189-193 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stiell, I. G., Clement, C. M., McKnight, R. D., Brison, R., Schull, M. J., Rowe, B. H., Worthington, J. R., Eisenhauer, M. A., Cass, D., Greenberg, G., MacPhail, I., Dreyer, J., Lee, J. S., Bandiera, G., Reardon, M., Holroyd, B., Lesiuk, H., Wells, G. A. (2003). The Canadian C-Spine Rule versus the NEXUS Low-Risk Criteria in Patients with Trauma. NEJM 349: 2510-2518 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Yealy, D. M., Auble, T. E. (2003). Choosing between Clinical Prediction Rules. NEJM 349: 2553-2555 [Full Text]  
• Bhandari, M., Montori, V. M., Swiontkowski, M. F., Guyatt, G. H. (2003). User's Guide to the Surgical Literature: How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test. JBJS 85: 1133-1140 [Full Text]  
• Ferrari, R (2002). Prevention of chronic pain after whiplash. Emerg. Med. J. 19: 526-530 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Olby, N., Munana, K., De Risio, L., Sebestyen, P., Hansen, B. (2002). Cervical Injury Following a Horse Kick to the Head in Two Dogs. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 38: 321-326 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fatovich, D. M (2002). Recent developments: Emergency medicine. BMJ 324: 958-962 [Full Text]  
• Skellett, S., Tibby, S. M, Durward, A., Murdoch, I. A (2002). Lesson of the week: Immobilisation of the cervical spine in children. BMJ 324: 591-593 [Full Text]  
• Lynch, R., Harris, Jr, J. H., Stiell, I. G., Wells, G. A. (2002). Decisions About Cervical Spine Radiography Following Trauma. JAMA 287: 583-584 [Full Text]  
• Bates, D., Butler, J. (2002). Cervical spine radiography in alert asymptomatic blunt trauma patients. Emerg. Med. J. 19: 47-48 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Stiell, I. G., Wells, G. A., Vandemheen, K. L., Clement, C. M., Lesiuk, H., De Maio, V. J., Laupacis, A., Schull, M., McKnight, R. D., Verbeek, R., Brison, R., Cass, D., Dreyer, J., Eisenhauer, M. A., Greenberg, G. H., MacPhail, I., Morrison, L., Reardon, M., Worthington, J. (2001). The Canadian C-Spine Rule for Radiography in Alert and Stable Trauma Patients. JAMA 286: 1841-1848 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Daffner, R. H. (2001). Identifying Patients at Low Risk for Cervical Spine Injury: The Canadian C-Spine Rule for Radiography. JAMA 286: 1893-1894 [Full Text]  
• (2001). Other Articles Noted. Evid. Based Nurs. 4: E1-11 [Full Text]  
• Viccellio, P., Simon, H., Pressman, B. D., Shah, M. N., Mower, W. R., Hoffman, J. R., for the NEXUS Group, (2001). A Prospective Multicenter Study of Cervical Spine Injury in Children. Pediatrics 108 : e20-e20 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bloch, R. (2001). Absence of 5 clinical criteria ruled out cervical spine injury in blunt trauma in the emergency department. Evid. Based Med. 6: 63-63 [Full Text]  
• Omran, H. A., Dowd, M. D., Knapp, J. F. (2001). Removing the Pediatric Cervical Collar: Current Practice Patterns. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 155: 162-166 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Little, G., Kelly, M., Glucksman, E (2001). Critical pitfalls in the immediate assessment of the trauma patient. Trauma 3: 43-51 [Abstract]  
• Krochmal, P., April, R. S., Lanfranchi, R., Hoffman, J. R., Mower, W. R. (2000). Clinical Criteria to Rule Out Cervical-Spine Injury. NEJM 343: 1338-1339 [Full Text]  
• Stiell, I. G. (2000). Clinical decision rules in the emergency department. CMAJ 163: 1465-1466 [Full Text]  
• Myers, K. A. (2000). A clinical-decision rule for cervical spine injury. CMAJ 163: 754-754 [Full Text]  
• (2000). Ruling out C-Spine Injury Without Radiography. JWatch Emergency Med. 2000: 1-1 [Full Text]  
• (2000). Eliminating Unnecessary Cervical Spine X-Rays for Trauma Patients. JWatch General 2000: 4-4 [Full Text]  
• Marx, J. A., Biros, M. H. (2000). Who is at Low Risk after Head or Neck Trauma?. NEJM 343: 138-140 [Full Text]