The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Sounding Board
PreviousPrevious
Volume 343:293-296 July 27, 2000 Number 4
NextNext

The Rise and Fall of the Futility Movement

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
Between 1987 and 1996, the concept of "medical futility" was debated in the medical community with a vehemence that few philosophical concepts elicit. Before 1987, the concept was virtually unrecognized. Interest in the concept peaked in 1995, when 134 articles on the topic were published, and has subsequently waned; a Medline search of the key word "futility" for the year 1999 yielded only 31 articles.

The movement to establish a policy on futile treatment was an attempt to convince society that physicians could use their clinical judgment or epidemiologic skills to determine whether a particular treatment would be futile in . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Attempts to Define Futility

Empirical Assessments of Futility

Patients' Autonomy versus Physicians' Autonomy

Developing a Process to Resolve Disputes over Futility

Conclusions

References


Related Letters:

The Rise and Fall of the Futility Movement
Schneiderman L. J., Heilig S., Fine R. L., Mayo T. W., Wold E. R., Galanakis E., Helft P. R., Siegler M., Lantos J.
Extract | Full Text  
N Engl J Med 2000; 343:1575-1577, Nov 23, 2000. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.