The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 343:660-661 August 31, 2000 Number 9
NextNext

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Ware, L. B.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: We wonder why Ware and Matthay, in their review article on the acute respiratory distress syndrome (May 4 issue),1 neglect to discuss the role of prone positioning in the treatment of this disease. Prone positioning has been shown to improve the partial pressure of arterial oxygen in as many as 75 percent of patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome and to permit a decrease in the required fraction of inspired oxygen and positive end-expiratory pressure.2,3 Prone positioning causes greater ventilation of dependent portions of the lung than supine positioning and may therefore be considered a lung-recruitment . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.