FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 344:1087-1092 April 5, 2001 Number 14 Next

	Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

	Full Text PDF Purchase this article Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

Managed care now dominates health care in the United States. By 1999, only 8 percent of persons with employer-sponsored health insurance coverage had traditional indemnity insurance.¹ This reflects a sea change in the past two decades — not just in the financing of health insurance but also in the way medicine is practiced.

The rapid growth of managed care is not primarily due to enthusiasm for this approach on the part of patients or providers. Patients have had mixed reactions to managed care; they like the low copayments and reduced paperwork but view some managed-care practices as emphasizing cost control . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Evolution of Managed Care

Effects of Managed Care

Effect on Providers

Effect on Patients

Responses to Managed Care

Physicians and Medical Groups

Employers

Government

The Future

Conclusions

Source Information

University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, CA 94118

References

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Halm, E. A., Press, M. J., Tuhrim, S., Wang, J., Rojas, M., Chassin, M. R. (2008). Does Managed Care Affect Quality? Appropriateness, Referral Patterns, and Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy. American Journal of Medical Quality 23: 448-456 [Abstract]  
• Chang, G., Wilcox, M. (2005). Case Study: A Medicaid Health Maintenance Organization Quality Initiative for Behavioral Health. American Journal of Medical Quality 20: 98-103 [Abstract]  
• Pati, S., Shea, S., Rabinowitz, D., Carrasquillo, O. (2005). Health Expenditures for Privately Insured Adults Enrolled in Managed Care Gatekeeping vs Indemnity Plans. Am. J. Public Health 95: 286-291 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mariner, W. K. (2004). The Supreme Court's Limitation of Managed-Care Liability. NEJM 351: 1347-1352 [Full Text]  
• Kendig, N. E. (2004). Correctional Health Care Systems and Collaboration With Academic Medicine. JAMA 292: 501-503 [Full Text]  
• Freudenberg, N. (2004). Community Health Services for Returning Jail and Prison Inmates. JOURNAL OF CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE 10: 369-397 [Abstract]  
• Stuart, M., Weinrich, M. (2004). Integrated Health System for Chronic Disease Management: Lessons Learned From France. Chest 125: 695-703 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fairbrother, G., Gusmano, M. K., Park, H. L., Scheinmann, R. (2003). Care For The Uninsured In General Internists' Private Offices. Health Aff (Millwood) 22: 217-224 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pati, S., Shea, S., Rabinowitz, D., Carrasquillo, O. (2003). Does Gatekeeping Control Costs for Privately Insured Children? Findings From the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Pediatrics 111: 456-460 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Oberlander, J. (2002). The US health care system: On a road to nowhere?. CMAJ 167: 163-168 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rosenbaum, S., Kamoie, B. (2002). Managed Care and Public Health: Conflict and Collaboration. J Law Med Ethics 30: 191-200  
• Feachem, R. G A, Sekhri, N. K, White, K. L, Dixon, J., Berwick, D. M, Enthoven, A. C (2002). Getting more for their dollar: a comparison of the NHS with California's Kaiser Permanente Commentary: Funding is not the only factor Commentary: Same price, better care Commentary: Competition made them do it. BMJ 324: 135-143 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Persaud, R (2002). Reducing the stress in medicine. Postgrad. Med. J. 78: 1-3 [Full Text]  
• Murman, D. L. (2001). The Costs of Caring: Medical Costs of Alzheimer's Disease and The Managed Care Environment. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 14: 168-178 [Abstract]  
• Feldman, S. R., Coates, M. L., Fleischer, A. B. Jr, Mellen, B. G., Williford, P. M. (2001). Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermatologists and Nondermatologists. Arch Dermatol 137: 1645-1646 [Full Text]