|
|
|||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Great conceptual advances in science are often based on great technical advances. Either type of discovery can bring scientific fame. In 1896 Riva-Rocci devised the mercury sphygmomanometer for measuring blood pressure, but it took several decades for hypertension as a cause of disease to be unmasked. Conversely, Watson and Crick in 1953 discovered the structure of DNA but not the technique of x-ray crystallography that limited the number of possibilities for their model. There are countless other examples, but it is rare for a scientist to develop both a new instrument and new ideas. Camillo Golgi (18431925) did his utmost
HOME | SUBSCRIBE | SEARCH | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | PRIVACY | HELP | beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. |