The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 345:54-55 July 5, 2001 Number 1
NextNext

Vaginal Delivery after Cesarean Section — Is the Risk Acceptable?

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Lydon-Rochelle, M.
-PubMed Citation
Nearly 40 years ago, Douglas et al. documented the risk of uterine rupture during a trial of labor after cesarean section.1 Among more than 2000 women with scars from prior cesarean sections, uterine rupture occurred during labor in just over 1 percent, and more than a third of the fetuses in those cases died. The authors concluded, "Probably the most vehement objections to the policy of vaginal delivery after cesarean section allude to the occurrence of catastrophic ruptures of the uterine scar." That experience, coupled with the mantra "Once a cesarean, always a cesarean," cast the practice of vaginal delivery . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.