The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 345:1444-1451 November 15, 2001 Number 20
NextNext

A Comparison of Warfarin and Aspirin for the Prevention of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke
J.P. Mohr, M.D., J.L.P. Thompson, Ph.D., R.M. Lazar, Ph.D., B. Levin, M.D., R.L. Sacco, M.D., K.L. Furie, M.D., J.P. Kistler, M.D., G.W. Albers, M.D., L.C. Pettigrew, M.D., H.P. Adams, Jr., M.D., C.M. Jackson, M.D., P. Pullicino, M.D., for the Warfarin–Aspirin Recurrent Stroke Study Group

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Powers, W. J.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Despite the use of antiplatelet agents, usually aspirin, in patients who have had an ischemic stroke, there is still a substantial rate of recurrence. Therefore, we investigated whether warfarin, which is effective and superior to aspirin in the prevention of cardiogenic embolism, would also prove superior in the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with a prior noncardioembolic ischemic stroke.

Methods In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial, we compared the effect of warfarin (at a dose adjusted to produce an international normalized ratio of 1.4 to 2.8) and that of aspirin (325 mg per day) on the combined primary end point of recurrent ischemic stroke or death from any cause within two years.

Results The two randomized study groups were similar with respect to base-line risk factors. In the intention-to-treat analysis, no significant differences were found between the treatment groups in any of the outcomes measured. The primary end point of death or recurrent ischemic stroke was reached by 196 of 1103 patients assigned to warfarin (17.8 percent) and 176 of 1103 assigned to aspirin (16.0 percent; P=0.25; hazard ratio comparing warfarin with aspirin, 1.13; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.38). The rates of major hemorrhage were low (2.22 per 100 patient-years in the warfarin group and 1.49 per 100 patient-years in the aspirin group). Also, there were no significant treatment-related differences in the frequency of or time to the primary end point or major hemorrhage according to the cause of the initial stroke.

Conclusions Over a two-year period, we found no difference between aspirin and warfarin in the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke or death or in the rate of major hemorrhage. Consequently, we regard both warfarin and aspirin as reasonable therapeutic alternatives.


Source Information

From the Neurological Institute (J.P.M., R.M.L., R.L.S.) and the Department of Biostatistics (J.L.P.T., B.L.), Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (K.L.F., J.P.K.); Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, Calif. (G.W.A.); the University of Kentucky Medical Center, Louisville (L.C.P.); University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City (H.P.A.); the University of California at San Diego, San Diego (C.M.J.); and the State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo (P.P.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Mohr at the Neurological Institute, 710 W. 168th St., New York, NY 10032, or at jpm10{at}columbia.edu.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.