Most patients who die of cancer die because of metastatic disease,and therefore removal of the primary tumor in patients who alreadyhave evidence of metastasis seems illogical, at least in theabsence of symptoms caused by the primary tumor. Many thoughtfuloncologists have asked, "What is the point of closing the barndoor once the horse has bolted?" in the belief that subjectingpatients with incurable disease to the risks involved in unnecessarysurgery is a poor medical decision.
This idea is challenged in this issue of the Journal by Flaniganet al.,1 who report the results of a . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Madersbacher, S., Thalmann, G. N., Fritsch, J. C., Studer, U. E.
(2004). Is Eligibility for a Chemotherapy Protocol a Good Prognostic Factor for Invasive Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy?. JCO
22: 4103-4108
[Abstract][Full Text]
Bolger, G., Copur, M. S., Ledakis, P., Norvell, M., Polo, J. L., Schwartz, J. D., Flanigan, R. C.
(2002). Nephrectomy for Metastatic Renal-Cell Cancer. NEJM
346: 1095-1096
[Full Text]
(2002). The epistemology of epidemiology. CMAJ
166: 157-157
[Full Text]
(2002). L'epistemologie de l'epidemiologie:. CMAJ
166: 159-159
[Full Text]