The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
Volume 345:391-397 August 9, 2001 Number 6
NextNext

Resumption of Driving after Life-Threatening Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia
Toshio Akiyama, M.D., Judy L. Powell, B.S.N., L. Brent Mitchell, M.D., Frederick A. Ehlert, M.D., Christina Baessler, M.S.N., for the Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators Investigators

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Smith, T. W.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Although the privilege of driving must be respected, it may be necessary to restrict driving when it poses a threat to others. The risks associated with allowing patients with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias to drive have not been quantified.

Methods The Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) trial compared antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with the implantation of defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. In the current study, we sent patients who participated in the AVID trial a questionnaire, to be completed anonymously, requesting information about driving habits and experiences.

Results The questionnaire was returned by 758 of 909 patients (83 percent). Of these, 627 patients drove during the year before their index episode of ventricular tachyarrhythmia. A total of 57 percent of these patients resumed driving within 3 months after randomization in the AVID trial, 78 percent within 6 months, and 88 percent within 12 months. While driving, 2 percent had a syncopal episode, 11 percent had dizziness or palpitations that necessitated stopping the vehicle, 22 percent had dizziness or palpitations that did not necessitate stopping the vehicle, and 8 percent of the 295 patients with an implantable cardioverter–defibrillator received a shock. Fifty patients reported having at least 1 accident, for a total of 55 accidents during 1619 patient-years of follow-up after the resumption of driving (3.4 percent per patient-year). Only 11 percent of these accidents were preceded by symptoms of possible arrhythmia (0.4 percent per patient-year).

Conclusions Most patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias resume driving early. Although it is common for them to have symptoms of possible arrhythmia while driving, accidents are uncommon and occur with a frequency that is lower than the annual accident rate of 7.1 percent in the general driving population of the United States.


Source Information

From the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, N.Y. (T.A.); the University of Washington, Seattle (J.L.P.); the University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta., Canada (L.B.M.); St. Luke's–Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York (F.A.E.); and the Medical College of Pennsylvania–Hahnemann University, Philadelphia (C.B.).

Address reprint requests to Ms. Powell at the AVID Clinical Trial Center, University of Washington, 1107 N.E. 45th St., Rm. 505, Seattle, WA 98105-4689, or at avidctc{at}u.washington.edu.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.