FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 345:504-511 August 16, 2001 Number 7 Next

	Full Text PDF Editorial by Kessler, D. A. Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited PubMed Citation

ABSTRACT

Background In 1998, the attorneys general of 46 states signed a Master Settlement Agreement with the four largest tobacco companies in the United States. The agreement prohibits tobacco advertising that targets people younger than 18 years of age.

Methods We analyzed the trends in expenditures for advertising for 15 specific brands of cigarettes and the exposure of young people to cigarette advertising in 38 magazines between 1995 and 2000. We defined cigarette brands as "youth" brands if they were smoked by more than 5 percent of the smokers in the 8th, 10th, and 12th grades in 1998; all others were considered to be "adult" brands. We classified magazines as youth-oriented magazines if at least 15 percent of their readers or at least 2 million of their readers were 12 to 17 years old. "Reach," a standard measure of exposure to advertising, was defined as the number of young persons who read at least one issue of a magazine containing an advertisement for a particular brand of cigarette during a given year.

Results In 2000 dollars, the overall advertising expenditures for the 15 brands of cigarettes in the 38 magazines were $238.2 million in 1995, $219.3 million in 1998, $291.1 million in 1999, and $216.9 million in 2000. Expenditures for youth brands in youth-oriented magazines were $56.4 million in 1995, $58.5 million in 1998, $67.4 million in 1999, and $59.6 million in 2000. Expenditures for adult brands in youth-oriented magazines were $72.2 million, $82.3 million, $108.6 million, and $67.6 million, respectively. In 2000, magazine advertisements for youth brands of cigarettes reached more than 80 percent of young people in the United States an average of 17 times each.

Conclusions The Master Settlement Agreement with the tobacco industry appears to have had little effect on cigarette advertising in magazines and on the exposure of young people to these advertisements.

Source Information

From the Harvard Business School (C.K.) and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health (M.S.) — both in Boston.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Siegel at the Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St., TW2, Boston, MA 02118, or at mbsiegel{at}bu.edu.

Full Text of this Article

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Alpert, H. R., Koh, H. K., Connolly, G. N. (2008). After The Master Settlement Agreement: Targeting And Exposure Of Youth To Magazine Tobacco Advertising. Health Aff (Millwood) 27: w503-w512 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Morrison, M. A., Krugman, D. M., Park, P. (2008). Under the Radar: Smokeless Tobacco Advertising in Magazines With Substantial Youth Readership. AJPH 98: 543-548 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gilpin, E. A., White, M. M., Messer, K., Pierce, J. P. (2007). Receptivity to Tobacco Advertising and Promotions Among Young Adolescents as a Predictor of Established Smoking in Young Adulthood. AJPH 97: 1489-1495 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rajkumar, R., Gross, C. P., Forman, H. P. (2006). Is the Tobacco Settlement Constitutional?. J Law Med Ethics 34: 748-752  
• Committee on Communications, (2006). Children, Adolescents, and Advertising. Pediatrics 118: 2563-2569 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Goldberg, M. E, Davis, R. M, O'Keefe, A. M. (2006). The role of tobacco advertising and promotion: themes employed in litigation by tobacco industry witnesses. Tobacco Control 15: iv54-iv67 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Audrain-McGovern, J., Rodriguez, D., Patel, V., Faith, M. S., Rodgers, K., Cuevas, J. (2006). How Do Psychological Factors Influence Adolescent Smoking Progression? The Evidence for Indirect Effects Through Tobacco Advertising Receptivity. Pediatrics 117: 1216-1225 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Healton, C, Farrelly, M C, Weitzenkamp, D, Lindsey, D, Haviland, M L (2006). Youth smoking prevention and tobacco industry revenue.. Tobacco Control 15: 103-106 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sebrie, E., Glantz, S. A (2006). The tobacco industry in developing countries. BMJ 332: 313-314 [Full Text]  
• Roggli, V. L., Piantadosi, C. A., MacIntyre, N. R., Young, S. L., Kussin, P. S., Steele, M. P., Carraway, M. S., Welty-Wolf, K. E., Govert, J. A., McMahon, T. J., Palmer, S. M., Sporn, T. A., Ghio, A. J. (2006). Physician Subsidies for Tobacco Advertising. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 173: 246-246 [Full Text]  
• Smith, E. A, Offen, N., Malone, R. E (2005). What makes an ad a cigarette ad? Commercial tobacco imagery in the lesbian, gay, and bisexual press. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59: 1086-1091 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Frieden, T. R., Blakeman, D. E. (2005). The Dirty Dozen: 12 Myths That Undermine Tobacco Control. AJPH 95: 1500-1505 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wen, C P, Chen, T, Tsai, Y-Y, Tsai, S P, Chung, W S I, Cheng, T Y, Levy, D T, Hsu, C C, Peterson, R, Liu, W-Y (2005). Are marketing campaigns in Taiwan by foreign tobacco companies targeting young smokers?. Tobacco Control 14: i38-i44 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sloan, F A, Mathews, C A, Trogdon, J G (2004). Impacts of the Master Settlement Agreement on the tobacco industry. Tobacco Control 13: 356-361 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Henriksen, L, Feighery, E C, Schleicher, N C, Haladjian, H H, Fortmann, S P (2004). Reaching youth at the point of sale: cigarette marketing is more prevalent in stores where adolescents shop frequently. Tobacco Control 13: 315-318 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Braverman, M. T., Aaro, L. E. (2004). Adolescent Smoking and Exposure to Tobacco Marketing Under a Tobacco Advertising Ban: Findings From 2 Norwegian National Samples. AJPH 94: 1230-1238 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Niemeyer, D., Miner, K. R., Carlson, L. M., Baer, K., Shorty, L. (2004). The 1998 Master Settlement Agreement: A Public Health Opportunity Realized--Or Lost?. Health Promot Pract 5: 21S-32S [Abstract]  
• Lieberman, A. (2004). The Effect of Enforcement of the Master Settlement Agreement on Youth Exposure to Print Advertising. Health Promot Pract 5: 66S-74S [Abstract]  
• Pierce, J. P., Gilpin, E. A. (2004). How Did the Master Settlement Agreement Change Tobacco Industry Expenditures for Cigarette Advertising and Promotions?. Health Promot Pract 5: 84S-90S [Abstract]  
• Gilpin, E. A., Distefan, J. M., Pierce, J. P. (2004). Population Receptivity to Tobacco Advertising/ Promotions and Exposure to Anti-Tobacco Media: Effect of Master Settlement Agreement in California: 1992-2002. Health Promot Pract 5: 91S-98S [Abstract]  
• Joffe, A., Yancy, W. S., the Committee on Substance Abuse and Committee on, (2004). Legalization of Marijuana: Potential Impact on Youth. Pediatrics 113: e632-e638 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jason, L. A., Pokorny, S. B., Mikulski, K., Schoeny, M. E. (2004). Assessing Storefront Tobacco Advertising after the Billboard Ban. Eval Health Prof 27: 22-33 [Abstract]  
• Lewis, M. J., Delnevo, C. D., Slade, J. (2004). Tobacco Industry Direct Mail Marketing and Participation by New Jersey Adults. AJPH 94: 257-259 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lantz, P M (2003). Smoking on the rise among young adults: implications for research and policy. Tobacco Control 12: i60-70 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Waxman, H A (2003). Tobacco industry statements in the US Department of Justice lawsuit. Tobacco Control 12: 94-101 [Full Text]  
• Mulshine, J L, Smith, R A (2002). Lung cancer * 2: Screening and early diagnosis of lung cancer. Thorax 57: 1071-1078 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gross, C. P., Soffer, B., Bach, P. B., Rajkumar, R., Forman, H. P. (2002). State Expenditures for Tobacco-Control Programs and the Tobacco Settlement. NEJM 347: 1080-1086 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Myers, M L (2002). Philip Morris changes its name, but not its harmful practices. Tobacco Control 11: 169-170 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jacobson, P. D., Soliman, S. (2002). Litigation as Public Health Policy: Theory or Reality?. J Law Med Ethics 30: 224-238  
• Hamilton, W L, Turner-Bowker, D M, Celebucki, C C, Connolly, G N (2002). Cigarette advertising in magazines: the tobacco industry response to the Master Settlement Agreement and to public pressure. Tobacco Control 11: ii54-58 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Merlo, E., Garfield, C. F., Chung, P. J. (2002). The Tobacco Industry Responds. Health Aff (Millwood) 21: 281-283 [Full Text]  
• Chung, P. J., Garfield, C. F., Rathouz, P. J., Lauderdale, D. S., Best, D., Lantos, J. (2002). Youth Targeting By Tobacco Manufacturers Since The Master Settlement Agreement. Health Aff (Millwood) 21: 254-263 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cummings, K M, Morley, C P, Horan, J K, Steger, C, Leavell, N-R (2002). Marketing to America's youth: evidence from corporate documents. Tobacco Control 11: i5-17 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rajkumar, R. (2001). New Directions in Tobacco Control. JAMA 286: 2732-2732 [Full Text]  
• Kessler, D. A., Myers, M. L. (2001). Beyond the Tobacco Settlement. NEJM 345: 535-537 [Full Text]