The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 345:568-573 August 23, 2001 Number 8
NextNext

Effect of Prone Positioning on the Survival of Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure
Luciano Gattinoni, M.D., Gianni Tognoni, M.D., Antonio Pesenti, M.D., Paolo Taccone, M.D., Daniele Mascheroni, M.D., Violeta Labarta, M.S., Roberto Malacrida, M.D., Paola Di Giulio, R.N., M.S.C., Roberto Fumagalli, M.D., Paolo Pelosi, M.D., Luca Brazzi, M.D., Roberto Latini, M.D., for the Prone–Supine Study Group

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Slutsky, A. S.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Although placing patients with acute respiratory failure in a prone (face down) position improves their oxygenation 60 to 70 percent of the time, the effect on survival is not known.

Methods In a multicenter, randomized trial, we compared conventional treatment (in the supine position) of patients with acute lung injury or the acute respiratory distress syndrome with a predefined strategy of placing patients in a prone position for six or more hours daily for 10 days. We enrolled 304 patients, 152 in each group.

Results The mortality rate was 23.0 percent during the 10-day study period, 49.3 percent at the time of discharge from the intensive care unit, and 60.5 percent at 6 months. The relative risk of death in the prone group as compared with the supine group was 0.84 at the end of the study period (95 percent confidence interval, 0.56 to 1.27), 1.05 at the time of discharge from the intensive care unit (95 percent confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.32), and 1.06 at six months (95 percent confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.28). During the study period the mean (±SD) increase in the ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, measured each morning while patients were supine, was greater in the prone than the supine group (63.0±66.8 vs. 44.6±68.2, P=0.02). The incidence of complications related to positioning (such as pressure sores and accidental extubation) was similar in the two groups.

Conclusions Although placing patients with acute respiratory failure in a prone position improves their oxygenation, it does not improve survival.


Source Information

From the Istituto di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Università di Milano, Ospedale Maggiore di Milano, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy (L.G., P.T., D.M., P.P., L.B.); the Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy (G.T., V.L., P.D., R.L.); the Istituto di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Università di Milano–Bicocca, Ospedale S. Gerardo, Monza, Italy (A.P., R.F.); and the Department of Intensive Care and Anesthesia, Lugano Civic Hospital, Lugano, Switzerland (R.M.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Gattinoni at the Istituto di Anestesia e Rianimazione, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico–IRCCS, Via Francesco Sforza 35, I-20122 Milan, Italy, or at gattinon{at}polic.cilea.it.

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.