The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Perspective
Volume 346:1182-1183 April 18, 2002 Number 16
NextNext

Restenosis after Angioplasty

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Waksman, R.
-PubMed Citation
Over the past two decades, percutaneous coronary intervention has revolutionized the treatment of symptomatic coronary artery disease, sparing countless patients the need for surgical revascularization. This year, up to a million procedures are likely to be performed in North America alone.

The success of percutaneous coronary intervention has been due largely to an explosion in technology development, with the introduction of a broad array of balloon catheters, atherectomy devices, lasers, and stents. The impetus for the development of such devices has been the occurrence — noted soon after the introduction of balloon angioplasty — of intimal tears, arterial recoil, and . . . [Full Text of this Article]


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.