The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 346:92-98 January 10, 2002 Number 2
NextNext

Comparison of Four Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Joan H. Schiller, M.D., David Harrington, Ph.D., Chandra P. Belani, M.D., Corey Langer, M.D., Alan Sandler, M.D., James Krook, M.D., Junming Zhu, Ph.D., David H. Johnson, M.D., for the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Carney, D. N.

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background We conducted a randomized study to determine whether any of three chemotherapy regimens was superior to cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer.

Methods A total of 1207 patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned to a reference regimen of cisplatin and paclitaxel or to one of three experimental regimens: cisplatin and gemcitabine, cisplatin and docetaxel, or carboplatin and paclitaxel.

Results The response rate for all 1155 eligible patients was 19 percent, with a median survival of 7.9 months (95 percent confidence interval, 7.3 to 8.5), a 1-year survival rate of 33 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 30 to 36 percent), and a 2-year survival rate of 11 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 8 to 12 percent). The response rate and survival did not differ significantly between patients assigned to receive cisplatin and paclitaxel and those assigned to receive any of the three experimental regimens. Treatment with cisplatin and gemcitabine was associated with a significantly longer time to the progression of disease than was treatment with cisplatin and paclitaxel but was more likely to cause grade 3, 4, or 5 renal toxicity (in 9 percent of patients, vs. 3 percent of those treated with cisplatin plus paclitaxel). Patients with a performance status of 2 had a significantly lower rate of survival than did those with a performance status of 0 or 1.

Conclusions None of four chemotherapy regimens offered a significant advantage over the others in the treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer.


Source Information

From the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison (J.H.S.); the Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (D.H., J.Z.); the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh (C.P.B.); the Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia (C.L.); Indiana University, Indianapolis (A.S.); the Duluth Clinic, Duluth, Minn. (J.K.); and Vanderbilt University, Nashville (D.H.J.).

Full Text of this Article


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.