The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 346:1914-1916 June 13, 2002 Number 24
NextNext

What Vitamins Should I Be Taking?

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Brown, B. G.
-Related Article
 by Willett, W. C.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: Willett and Stampfer state in their Clinical Practice article (Dec. 20 issue)1 that "assuming a low probability that vitamin E will eventually be proved efficacious [against coronary disease] (and we view the probability as fairly high), the likelihood of benefit would still outweigh the very low probability of harm." Brown et al. (Nov. 29 issue)2 reported that, among patients with established coronary disease, the combination of antioxidants (800 IU of vitamin E, 25 mg of natural beta carotene, and 100 µg of selenium) with simvastatin and niacin resulted in less benefit than simvastatin and niacin alone. The . . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.