The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 346:278-280 January 24, 2002 Number 4
NextNext

Empirical Antifungal Therapy — New Options, New Tradeoffs

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Walsh, T. J.
-PubMed Citation
The risk of fungal infections increases greatly in patients with profound and protracted neutropenia. Because of the insensitivity of diagnostic methods and the poor outcomes associated with established infections, empirical antifungal therapy is used for patients with neutropenia who have persistent fever despite the administration of antibacterial agents. Although conventional amphotericin B has been considered the optimal first-line agent, its status as the preferred treatment has recently been challenged by the results of trials comparing it with antifungal triazoles and lipid formulations of amphotericin B (Table 1).

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Randomized Studies Comparing Treatment with Antifungal Agents for Fever during Neutropenia.

 
. . . [Full Text of this Article]

References


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.