The battle over physician-assisted suicide in Oregon never seemsto end. On November 6, 2001, U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroftruled that the Oregon law legalizing physician-assisted suicideviolated the federal Controlled Substances Act, a 1970 law designedto prevent drug abuse and illegal-drug trafficking.1 Reversingthe ruling of his predecessor, Janet Reno, Ashcroft authorizedthe Drug Enforcement Administration to take action against Oregonphysicians who prescribe lethal doses of medication to terminallyill patients. On November 20, in response to a legal challengebased on the argument that the federal drug law cannot be usedin this manner, U.S. . . . [Full Text of this Article]
The Oregon Act
Effects of the Oregon Law
The Controlled Substances Act
Challenges to the Oregon Act
Proposed Legislation
The Attorney General's Ruling
Implications of the Ruling
The Uncertain Future
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
Lyness, J. M.
(2007). End-of-Life Care: Issues Relevant to the Geriatric Psychiatrist. Focus
5: 459-471
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lyness, J. M.
(2005). End-of-Life Care: Issues Relevant to the Geriatric Psychiatrist. Focus
3: 341-353
[Abstract][Full Text]
Lyness, J. M.
(2004). End-of-Life Care: Issues Relevant to the Geriatric Psychiatrist. AJGP
12: 457-472
[Abstract][Full Text]
Steinbrook, R.
(2004). Medical Marijuana, Physician-Assisted Suicide, and the Controlled Substances Act. NEJM
351: 1380-1383
[Full Text]
Palmer, L. I.
(2003). The Legal and Political Future of Physician-Assisted Suicide. JAMA
289: 2283-2283
[Full Text]
Meier, D. E., Morrison, R. S.
(2002). Autonomy Reconsidered. NEJM
346: 1087-1089
[Full Text]
Lowenstein, E., Wanzer, S. H.
(2002). The U.S. Attorney General's Intrusion into Medical Practice. NEJM
346: 447-448
[Full Text]