The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, which resultedin approximately 3000 deaths and more than 4000 injuries, hada predictable effect: people wanted to donate blood. This altruisticand commendable response may have boosted the morale of theblood donors, but it did nothing for the victims. Similar responseshave occurred many times over the period of 55 years since blood-donorprograms were introduced, after World War II. After a majordisaster, well-intentioned people call for immediate blood donationswithout realizing that all the blood that can be transfusedimmediately is already available at the disaster site or in. . . [Full Text of this Article]
Previous Disasters
Kansas City, Missouri, July 17, 1981
Sioux City, Iowa, July 19, 1989
Oklahoma City, April 19, 1995
Denver, April 20, 1999
September 11, 2001
Benefits
Costs
Conclusions
References
Related Letters:
Blood and Disaster
Katz L., Klein H. G., Lipton K. S., Gevirtz C., Schmidt P. J.
Extract |
Full Text |
PDF
N Engl J Med 2002;
347:68-69, Jul 4, 2002.
Correspondence
This article has been cited by other articles:
Glynn, S. A., Busch, M. P., Schreiber, G. B., Murphy, E. L., Wright, D. J., Tu, Y., Kleinman, S. H.
(2003). Effect of a National Disaster on Blood Supply and Safety: The September 11 Experience. JAMA
289: 2246-2253
[Abstract][Full Text]
Katz, L., Klein, H. G., Lipton, K. S., Gevirtz, C., Schmidt, P. J.
(2002). Blood and Disaster. NEJM
347: 68-69
[Full Text]