The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 347:1143-1150 October 10, 2002 Number 15
NextNext

Heparin plus Alteplase Compared with Heparin Alone in Patients with Submassive Pulmonary Embolism
Stavros Konstantinides, M.D., Annette Geibel, M.D., Gerhard Heusel, Ph.D., Fritz Heinrich, M.D., Wolfgang Kasper, M.D., for the Management Strategies and Prognosis of Pulmonary Embolism-3 Trial Investigators

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Perspective
 by Goldhaber, S. Z.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background The use of thrombolytic agents in the treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with acute submassive pulmonary embolism remains controversial.

Methods We conducted a study of patients with acute pulmonary embolism and pulmonary hypertension or right ventricular dysfunction but without arterial hypotension or shock. The patients were randomly assigned in double-blind fashion to receive heparin plus 100 mg of alteplase or heparin plus placebo over a period of two hours. The primary end point was in-hospital death or clinical deterioration requiring an escalation of treatment, which was defined as catecholamine infusion, secondary thrombolysis, endotracheal intubation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or emergency surgical embolectomy or thrombus fragmentation by catheter.

Results Of 256 patients enrolled, 118 were randomly assigned to receive heparin plus alteplase and 138 to receive heparin plus placebo. The incidence of the primary end point was significantly higher in the heparin-plus-placebo group than in the heparin-plus-alteplase group (P=0.006), and the probability of 30-day event-free survival (according to Kaplan–Meier analysis) was higher in the heparin-plus-alteplase group (P=0.005). This difference was due to the higher incidence of treatment escalation in the heparin-plus-placebo group (24.6 percent vs. 10.2 percent, P=0.004), since mortality was low in both groups (3.4 percent in the heparin-plus-alteplase group and 2.2 percent in the heparin-plus-placebo group, P=0.71). Treatment with heparin plus placebo was associated with almost three times the risk of death or treatment escalation that was associated with heparin plus alteplase (P=0.006). No fatal bleeding or cerebral bleeding occurred in patients receiving heparin plus alteplase.

Conclusions When given in conjunction with heparin, alteplase can improve the clinical course of stable patients who have acute submassive pulmonary embolism and can prevent clinical deterioration requiring the escalation of treatment during the hospital stay.


Source Information

From the Department of Cardiology and Pulmonary Medicine, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen (S.K.); the Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg (A.G.); Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, Ingelheim (G.H.); Krankenhaus Bruchsal, Bruchsal (F.H.); and Department of Internal Medicine, St. Josefs Hospital, Wiesbaden (W.K.) — all in Germany.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Konstantinides at the Department of Cardiology and Pulmonary Medicine, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Robert Koch Str. 40, Göttingen, D-37075 Germany, or at skonstan{at}med.uni-goettingen.de.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Thrombolytic Therapy in Patients with Submassive Pulmonary Embolism
Ashton R. W., Daniels C. E., Ryu J. H., Gunn N. A., Tierney L. M. Jr., Berlin D. A., Dalen J. E., Ajani A. E., Waksman R., Konstantinides S., Kasper W.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2003; 348:357-359, Jan 23, 2003. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.