The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 347:1449-1451 October 31, 2002 Number 18
NextNext

Major Birth Defects after Assisted Reproduction

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Hansen, M.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: We agree with Hansen et al. (March 7 issue)1 that many studies of birth defects after in vitro fertilization suffer from methodologic problems, but we believe that their study has similar limitations. The authors compared the outcomes of roughly 1000 children conceived with in vitro fertilization with those of control infants born to mothers who were significantly younger than the women who conceived with in vitro fertilization, were more likely to be parous, and were more ethnically diverse. In addition, they made no attempt to control for a history of infertility or the age of the father . . . [Full Text of this Article]




HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.