The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 347:147-148 July 11, 2002 Number 2
NextNext

Ooplasmic Transfer

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Templeton, A.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: In his Sounding Board article (March 7 issue),1 Dr. Templeton notes that ooplasmic transfer raises novel issues related to family law, kinship, and relationships, in addition to important issues regarding health and safety. A child born after an ooplasmic transfer would have a second genetic mother — the source of the mitochondrial DNA in the donated ooplasm. However, if this technique proves safe and effective for oocyte insufficiency, the rules of family law would easily adjust to it, just as they have with egg donation, a rapidly growing assisted reproductive technique.

Like other egg donors, the woman . . . [Full Text of this Article]




HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.