The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
A correction has been published: N Engl J Med 2003;348(2):186.

Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 347:1893-1895 December 5, 2002 Number 23
NextNext

Availability of Neonatal Intensive Care and Neonatal Mortality

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-Related Article
 by Grumbach, K.
-Related Article
-Related Article
 by Goodman, D. C.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: The article by Goodman et al. (May 16 issue)1 and the accompanying editorial by Grumbach2 criticize what these authors interpret as excessive concentrations of neonatologists in response to profit-maximizing behavior by hospitals — proof that there are too many specialists. However, a casual inspection of the maps in Figure 1 of the article reveals that most areas with high ratios of neonatologists to neonates are not hotbeds of health care competition but, rather, sparsely populated regions of the country, such as Alaska, Appalachia, northern Maine, western Texas, and the Dakotas. These higher ratios do not represent an . . . [Full Text of this Article]




HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.