The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 347:233-239 July 25, 2002 Number 4
NextNext

A Population-Based Comparison of Strategies to Prevent Early-Onset Group B Streptococcal Disease in Neonates
Stephanie J. Schrag, D.Phil., Elizabeth R. Zell, M.Stat., Ruth Lynfield, M.D., Aaron Roome, Ph.D., Kathryn E. Arnold, M.D., Allen S. Craig, M.D., Lee H. Harrison, M.D., Arthur Reingold, M.D., Karen Stefonek, R.N., M.P.H., Glenda Smith, B.S., Melanie Gamble, M.P.H., Anne Schuchat, M.D., for the Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Team

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Eschenbach, D. A.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Guidelines issued in 1996 in the United States recommend either screening of pregnant women for group B streptococcal colonization by means of cultures (screening approach) or assessing clinical risk factors (risk-based approach) to identify candidates for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis.

Methods In a multistate retrospective cohort study, we compared the effectiveness of the screening and risk-based approaches in preventing early-onset group B streptococcal disease (in infants less than seven days old). We studied a stratified random sample of the 629,912 live births in 1998 and 1999 in eight geographical areas where there was active surveillance for group B streptococcal infection, including all births in which the neonate had early-onset disease. Women with no documented culture for group B streptococcus were considered to have been cared for according to the risk-based approach.

Results We studied 5144 births, including 312 in which the newborn had early-onset group B streptococcal disease. Antenatal screening was documented for 52 percent of the mothers. The risk of early-onset disease was significantly lower among the infants of screened women than among those in the risk-based group (adjusted relative risk, 0.46; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.60). Because women whose providers had no strategy for prophylaxis may have been misclassified in the risk-based group, we excluded all women with risk factors and adequate time for prophylaxis who did not receive antibiotics. The adjusted relative risk of early-onset disease associated with the screening approach in this secondary analysis was similar — 0.48 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.37 to 0.63).

Conclusions Routine screening for group B streptococcus during pregnancy prevents more cases of early-onset disease than the risk-based approach. Recommendations that endorse both strategies as equivalent warrant reconsideration.


Source Information

From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta (S.J.S., E.R.Z., M.G., A.S.); the Minnesota Department of Health, Minneapolis (R.L.); the Connecticut Department of Public Health, Hartford (A. Roome); the Georgia Department of Human Resources, Atlanta (K.E.A.); the Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville (A.S.C.); Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (L.H.H.); the School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley (A. Reingold); the Department of Human Services–Health Services, Portland, Oreg. (K.S.); and the New York Department of Health, Albany (G.S.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Schrag at the Respiratory Diseases Branch, MS-C23, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30333, or at zha6{at}cdc.gov.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Prevention of Early-Onset Group B Streptococcal Disease in Neonates
Fay D. L., Wenninger C. J., Khandelwal M., Harmanli O. H., Schrag S. J., Schuchat A., Mohle-Boetani J.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1798-1799, Nov 28, 2002. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.