The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 347:561-566 August 22, 2002 Number 8
NextNext

Comparison of Stenting with Minimally Invasive Bypass Surgery for Stenosis of the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery
Anno Diegeler, M.D., Holger Thiele, M.D., Volkmar Falk, M.D., Rainer Hambrecht, M.D., Niki Spyrantis, M.D., Peter Sick, M.D., Klaus W. Diederich, M.D., Friedrich W. Mohr, M.D., and Gerhard Schuler, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Perspective
 by MacGillivray, T. E.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Minimally invasive bypass surgery and coronary-artery stenting are both accepted treatments for isolated stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. We compared the clinical outcomes after these two procedures.

Methods A total of 220 symptomatic patients with high-grade lesions in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery were randomly assigned to treatment — 110 to surgery and 110 to stenting. The combined clinical end point was freedom from major adverse cardiac events, such as death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, and the need for repeated revascularization of the target lesion within six months.

Results A major adverse cardiac event occurred in 31 percent of patients after stenting, as compared with 15 percent in the surgery group (P=0.02). The difference was predominantly due to a higher rate of repeated revascularization of the target vessel for restenosis after stenting (29 percent vs. 8 percent, P=0.003). The combined rates of death and myocardial infarction did not differ significantly between groups (3 percent in the stenting group and 6 percent in the surgery group, P=0.50). Adverse events occurred more frequently after surgery. The percentage of patients free from angina after six months was 79 percent in the surgery group, as compared with 62 percent in the stenting group (P=0.03).

Conclusions In patients with isolated high-grade lesions of the proximal left anterior descending artery, both minimally invasive bypass surgery and stenting are effective. Stenting yields excellent short-term results with fewer periprocedural adverse events, but surgery is superior with regard to the need for repeated intervention in the target vessel and freedom from angina at six months of follow-up.


Source Information

From the Department of Cardiac Surgery (A.D., V.F., F.W.M.) and the Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology (H.T., R.H., N.S., P.S., K.W.D., G.S.), University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Schuler at the Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, University of Leipzig Heart Center, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany, or at schug{at}medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Minimally Invasive Bypass Surgery
LoGerfo F. W., Drenth D. J., Veeger N. J.G.M., Boonstra P. W., D'Ancona G., Karamanoukian H., Dragu R. E., Wood W. C., Thiele H., Mohr F. W., Schuler G., MacGillivray T. E., Vlahakes G. J.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2002; 347:2165-2168, Dec 26, 2002. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.