Not long ago, in vitro fertilization was the stuff of sciencefiction.1 Even after the birth of the first baby from in vitrofertilization in 1978, such births were initially few and farbetween, and there was skepticism about the future of in vitrofertilization as a mainstream medical procedure. Insurance companiesconsidered it experimental and therefore not eligible for coveragein benefit plans. Twenty years later, data collected by theCenters for Disease Control and Prevention from in vitro fertilizationclinics in the United States2 indicated that more than 58,000in vitro fertilization cycles were performed annually, resultingin . . . [Full Text of this Article]
van der Steeg, J.W., Steures, P., Eijkemans, M.J.C., Habbema, J.D.F., Hompes, P.G.A., Broekmans, F.J., van Dessel, H.J.H.M., Bossuyt, P.M.M., van der Veen, F., Mol, B.W.J., on behalf of Cecerm study group,
(2007). Pregnancy is predictable: a large-scale prospective external validation of the prediction of spontaneous pregnancy in subfertile couples. Hum Reprod
22: 536-542
[Abstract][Full Text]
Ombelet, W., De Sutter, P., Van der Elst, J., Martens, G.
(2005). Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction--the Belgian project. Hum Reprod Update
11: 3-14
[Abstract][Full Text]
Reynolds, M. A., Schieve, L. A., Peterson, H. B., Jain, T., Harlow, B. L., Hornstein, M. D.
(2003). Insurance Coverage and Outcomes of in Vitro Fertilization. NEJM
348: 958-959
[Full Text]