FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 347:693-696 August 29, 2002 Number 9 Next

	Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

	Full Text PDF PDA Full Text Purchase this article Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited Related Article by Epstein, A. M. Related Article by Birkmeyer, J. D. Related Article by Begg, C. B. PubMed Citation

To the Editor: The attempt of Birkmeyer et al. (April 11 issue)¹ to correlate low procedure-specific hospital volume with increased mortality has methodologic and interpretive problems. The investigators used data from the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (excluding those for Medicare patients enrolled in health maintenance organizations) and from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, without verification, to estimate procedure-specific hospital volume. The correlation between Medicare volume and hospital volume (correlation coefficient, 0.97) probably resulted from mathematic coupling,^2,3 which occurs when variables are shared. Were the relations between outcome and volume significant when only Medicare volumes were analyzed?

No proof of validation . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Goodney, P. P., Lucas, F.L., Birkmeyer, J. D. (2003). Should Volume Standards for Cardiovascular Surgery Focus Only on High-Risk Patients?. Circulation 107: 384-387 [Abstract] [Full Text]