FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 348:1725-1726 April 24, 2003 Number 17 Next

	Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

	Full Text PDF PDA Full Text Purchase this article Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited E-mail When Letters Appear Related Article by Shevell, M. PubMed Citation

To the Editor: Shevell's scholarly and articulate review of the Hallervorden–Spatz syndrome (Jan. 2 issue)¹ is to be applauded, but he should reconsider the contention that Hallervorden's eponym should be discarded because of his ethical transgressions in wartime Germany. Surely the opposite is true.

The author has already stated the case in favor of disease eponyms: not least that they force us "to recall our historical roots" and "recognize the pioneers . . . in . . . disease recognition." This disorder illustrates this case perfectly: long before I could describe the clinical features of Hallervorden–Spatz syndrome, I was aware . . . [Full Text of this Article]

HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org Comments and questions? Please contact us. The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.