The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 349:2167-2169 November 27, 2003 Number 22
NextNext

Coronary Angioplasty versus Fibrinolytic Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Andersen, H. R.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: Trials have shown that thrombolysis, as compared with placebo, reduces mortality even though it is associated with increases in the rates of reinfarction and stroke.1,2 The Danish Multicenter Randomized Study on Fibrinolytic Therapy versus Acute Myocardial Infarction (DANAMI-2) investigators (Aug. 21 issue)3 compared primary angioplasty with thrombolysis and used a combined end point of death, reinfarction, and stroke with the knowledge that the rates of the latter two would be higher after thrombolysis than they would be after angioplasty. Use of this combined outcome biased the results against thrombolysis. Moreover, long-term follow-up data on thrombolysis show that . . . [Full Text of this Article]


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.