The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 349:402-405 July 24, 2003 Number 4
NextNext

Hemoglobin and Nitric Oxide

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Schechter, A. N.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: The article by Schechter and Gladwin (April 10 issue)1 is flawed by a fundamental error. The conclusions that the authors draw from reports of measured S-nitrosohemoglobin levels and decomposition rates are not disciplined by quantitative standards of efficacy: "lower" does not imply "too low," nor does "rapid" imply "too rapid."

The authors cite studies in which S-nitrosohemoglobin levels (approximately 50 nmol per liter) are lower than those in previous reports (micromolar levels). They fail to mention, however, that Pawloski et al. demonstrated bioactivity of red cells with S-nitrosohemoglobin at 50 nmol per liter,2 and McMahon et al. . . . [Full Text of this Article]


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.