FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |   Search Term  Advanced Search

Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe

Previous Volume 350:1454-1460 April 1, 2004 Number 14 Next

	Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

	Full Text PDF PDA Full Text Purchase this article Letters Add to Personal Archive Add to Citation Manager Notify a Friend E-mail When Cited E-mail When Letters Appear PubMed Citation

About 1000 committees advise the federal government. Many of them address scientific, technical, and medical issues. There is a continuing dispute about whether the administration of President George W. Bush has compromised the system of advisory committees by manipulating it for political and ideological reasons and seeking scientific advice that matches the administration's own views. In turn, administration officials have rejected these charges as politically motivated. They maintain that they are supporting a strong system, not subverting it by stacking the committees. The controversy comes at a time of exceptional partisanship in Washington, with major battles over many issues, including . . . [Full Text of this Article]

The Controversy

The Fogarty International Center Advisory Board

Views of the Bush Administration and Its Critics

Prior Controversies

The Federal Advisory Committee System

Evaluating the Controversy

Proposals for Reform

Related Letters:

Bioethics, Science, and Politics
Huckins D. S., Mareiniss D. P., Meeks D. W., Dresser R., Blackburn E. H.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2004; 351:298-300, Jul 15, 2004. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Brown, M. B. (2008). Fairly Balanced: The Politics of Representation on Government Advisory Committees. Political Research Quarterly 61: 547-560 [Abstract]  
• Kamerow, D. (2008). Politics and science: a cautionary tale for the presidential candidates. BMJ 337: a2093-a2093 [Full Text]  
• Guzelian, P. (2007). Evidence-based toxicology: call for papers. Hum Exp Toxicol 26: 5-7  
• Fuster, V. (2005). Where Am I Going? The Future of Academic Cardiovascular Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 46: 1A-4A [Full Text]  
• Curlin, F. A., Hall, D. E. (2005). Regarding Plan B: Science and Politics Cannot be Separated. Obstet Gynecol 105: 1148-1150 [Full Text]  
• Huckins, D. S., Mareiniss, D. P., Meeks, D. W., Dresser, R., Blackburn, E. H. (2004). Bioethics, Science, and Politics. NEJM 351: 298-300 [Full Text]  
• Palaganas, J., Civin, C. I. (2004). Two Steps Forward: Keeping the Momentum in Stem Cell Research. Stem Cells 22: 240-241 [Full Text]