The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 350:767-776 February 19, 2004 Number 8
NextNext

Alendronate versus Calcitriol for the Prevention of Bone Loss after Cardiac Transplantation
Elizabeth Shane, M.D., Vicki Addesso, B.S., Pearila B. Namerow, Ph.D., Donald J. McMahon, M.S., Shaw-Hwa Lo, Ph.D., Ronald B. Staron, M.D., Mark Zucker, M.D., Susan Pardi, N.P., Simon Maybaum, M.D., and Donna Mancini, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Perspective
 by Lindsay, R.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Osteoporosis is a well-known complication of cardiac transplantation. We conducted a randomized trial comparing alendronate with calcitriol for the prevention of bone loss during the first year after cardiac transplantation.

Methods A total of 149 patients were randomly assigned to receive either alendronate (10 mg per day) or calcitriol (0.5 µg per day) a mean (±SD) of 21±11 days after transplantation. Estimates of bone loss and the incidence of fractures among untreated patients were obtained from a reference group of 27 prospectively recruited patients who received cardiac transplants within the same period as the intervention groups.

Results At one year, the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine had decreased by a mean of 0.7 percent in the alendronate group and 1.6 percent in the calcitriol group (P=0.25 for the test of no difference). The bone mineral density at the femoral neck decreased by a mean of 1.7 percent in the alendronate group and 2.1 percent in the calcitriol group (P=0.69). In the reference group, the mean bone mineral density at the lumbar spine decreased by 3.2 percent (P=0.03 for the comparison with the alendronate group; P=0.15 for the comparison with the calcitriol group), and the mean density at the femoral neck decreased by 6.2 percent (P=0.001 for comparisons with both intervention groups). The incidence of vertebral fractures did not differ significantly among the groups (6.8 percent in the alendronate group, 3.6 percent in the calcitriol group, and 13.6 percent in the reference group). Hypercalciuria developed in 27 percent of the patients in the calcitriol group and 7 percent of those in the alendronate group (P=0.01).

Conclusions The degree of bone loss and the rates of fracture did not differ significantly between the intervention groups. Calcitriol was associated with a higher risk of hypercalciuria. Alendronate-treated patients sustained less bone loss at the spine than those in the reference group, and both intervention groups sustained less bone loss at the hip than the reference group. The requirement for monitoring the serum and urinary calcium levels in calcitriol-treated patients makes alendronate more attractive for the prevention of bone loss early after cardiac transplantation.


Source Information

From the Departments of Medicine (E.S., V.A., D.J.M., S.M., D.M.), Biostatistics (S.-H.L.), and Radiology (R.B.S.), College of Physicians and Surgeons, and the Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health (P.B.N.), Columbia University, New York; and the Department of Medicine, Newark–Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, N.J. (M.Z., S.P.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Shane at the Department of Medicine, PH8-864, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 W. 168th St., New York, NY 10032.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Alendronate versus Calcitriol for Prevention of Bone Loss after Cardiac Transplantation
Gutteridge D. H., Dejardin A., Devogelaer J.-P., Goffin E., Hoefle G., Holzmueller H., Drexel H., Shane E.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2004; 350:2306-2308, May 27, 2004. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.