The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Correspondence
PreviousPrevious
Volume 351:1360-1361 September 23, 2004 Number 13
NextNext

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
-Related Article
 by Olsen, N. J.
-Related Article
 by O'Dell, J. R.
-PubMed Citation
To the Editor: The data reported by O'Dell (June 17 issue)1 and by Olsen and Stein (May 20 issue)2 on biologic drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis reveal many points of uncertainty. First, the number of randomized trials that have compared new biologic agents plus methotrexate with methotrexate alone is small — a single, unreplicated trial of infliximab and adalimumab and two trials of etanercept. (The latest trial is very recent3 and is not mentioned by Olsen and Stein.) In addition, the number of patients who were enrolled in these trials is small (83 in the infliximab group, 67 . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Letters:

New Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Messori A., Santarlasci B., Vaiani M.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2004; 351:937-938, Aug 26, 2004. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.