The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Perspective
PreviousPrevious
Volume 351:1820-1822 October 28, 2004 Number 18
NextNext

Registration of Clinical Trials — Voluntary or Mandatory?
Robert Steinbrook, M.D.

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
Should the public registration of clinical trials be voluntary or mandatory, as bills introduced earlier this month in Congress would require? What trials should be included? Proposals for mandatory registration have gained support because of concerns about the effects on medical practice of concealing negative data, concerns about the protection of research subjects, particularly in studies of investigational products, and concerns about the availability of information to researchers, physicians, people seeking to enroll as subjects in trials, and the public.1,2 Critics argue that mandatory registration could reveal information that manufacturers consider proprietary, such as the results of small or exploratory . . . [Full Text of this Article]


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.