The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 351:337-345 July 22, 2004 Number 4
NextNext

Cetuximab Monotherapy and Cetuximab plus Irinotecan in Irinotecan-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
David Cunningham, M.D., Yves Humblet, M.D., Ph.D., Salvatore Siena, M.D., David Khayat, M.D., Ph.D., Harry Bleiberg, M.D., Ph.D., Armando Santoro, M.D., Danny Bets, M.Sc., Matthias Mueser, M.D., Andreas Harstrick, M.D., Chris Verslype, M.D., Ph.D., Ian Chau, M.B., B.S., and Eric Van Cutsem, M.D., Ph.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Perspective
 by Schrag, D.
-Editorial
 by Erlichman, C.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which participates in signaling pathways that are deregulated in cancer cells, commonly appears on colorectal-cancer cells. Cetuximab is a monoclonal antibody that specifically blocks the EGFR. We compared the efficacy of cetuximab in combination with irinotecan with that of cetuximab alone in metastatic colorectal cancer that was refractory to treatment with irinotecan.

Methods We randomly assigned 329 patients whose disease had progressed during or within three months after treatment with an irinotecan-based regimen to receive either cetuximab and irinotecan (at the same dose and schedule as in a prestudy regimen [218 patients]) or cetuximab monotherapy (111 patients). In cases of disease progression, the addition of irinotecan to cetuximab monotherapy was permitted. The patients were evaluated radiologically for tumor response and were also evaluated for the time to tumor progression, survival, and side effects of treatment.

Results The rate of response in the combination-therapy group was significantly higher than that in the monotherapy group (22.9 percent [95 percent confidence interval, 17.5 to 29.1 percent] vs. 10.8 percent [95 percent confidence interval, 5.7 to 18.1 percent], P=0.007). The median time to progression was significantly greater in the combination-therapy group (4.1 vs. 1.5 months, P<0.001 by the log-rank test). The median survival time was 8.6 months in the combination-therapy group and 6.9 months in the monotherapy group (P=0.48). Toxic effects were more frequent in the combination-therapy group, but their severity and incidence were similar to those that would be expected with irinotecan alone.

Conclusions Cetuximab has clinically significant activity when given alone or in combination with irinotecan in patients with irinotecan-refractory colorectal cancer.


Source Information

From the Royal Marsden Hospital, London and Surrey, United Kingdom (D.C., I.C.); Saint-Luc University Hospital, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels (Y.H.); Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milan (S.S.); Hôpital Salpêtrière, Paris (D.K.); Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels (H.B.); Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano-Milano, Italy (A.S.); Merck, Amsterdam (D.B.); Merck, Darmstadt, Germany (M.M., A.H.); and University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (C.V., E.C.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. Cunningham at the Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Rd., Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom, or at david.cunningham{at}icr.ac.uk.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Cetuximab in Colon Cancer
Holmer A. F., Martin M. J., Costa A. F., Sander G. B., Picon P. D., Schrag D., Chau I., Cunningham D.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2004; 351:1575-1576, Oct 7, 2004. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.