The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Sounding Board
PreviousPrevious
Volume 352:1255-1260 March 24, 2005 Number 12
NextNext

Health Care Vouchers — A Proposal for Universal Coverage
Ezekiel J. Emanuel, M.D., Ph.D., and Victor R. Fuchs, Ph.D.

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Kronick, R.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
Dissatisfaction with the financing of U.S. health care is widespread. The system is inefficient, inequitable, and increasingly perceived to be unaffordable.1,2,3,4 Because only incremental reform is deemed politically feasible, inordinate attention is devoted to treating the institutional symptoms rather than diagnosing systemic problems that require major surgery. As an alternative, we propose a voucher system for universal health care, an efficient, fair, and relatively simple approach that might elicit broad support. We recognize that change is not imminent, but such a proposal can stimulate discussion and provide a readily available model when the political climate becomes hospitable for endorsing meaningful . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Flaws in the Current Health Care Financing System

Features of the Voucher System

Universality

Free Choice of Health Plan

Freedom to Purchase Additional Services

Funding by an Earmarked Value-Added Tax

Reliance on a Private Delivery System

End of Employer-Based Insurance

Elimination of Medicaid and Other Means-Tested Programs

Phasing Out of Medicare

Administration

Assessment of Technology and Outcomes

Universal Benefits Package

Economic Feasibility

Political Feasibility

Issues Requiring Additional Study


Source Information

From the Posterity Project, Chicago (E.J.E.); and the Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. (V.R.F.).


Related Letters:

A Proposal for Universal Coverage
Relman A. S., Hinkel J. M., Emanuel E. J., Fuchs V. R.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2005; 353:96-97, Jul 7, 2005. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.