The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 352:2235-2237 May 26, 2005 Number 21
NextNext

Methods of Coronary Revascularization — Things May Not Be as They Seem
Bernard J. Gersh, M.B., Ch.B., D.Phil., and Robert L. Frye, M.D.

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Hannan, E. L.
-PubMed Citation
During the past three decades, randomized trials and registries have provided extensive evidence regarding the indications for and preferred method of coronary revascularization.1 The initial trials focused on indications for coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus medical therapy. Subsequent trials compared percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with medical therapy, and CABG with PTCA. These were followed by comparisons of PTCA with devices and stents; one trial compared coronary revascularization with medical therapy in elderly patients.2

The New York registries of CABG and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), which were used in the study reported by Hannan et al. in this issue of . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Source Information

From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn.


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.