The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 353:1224-1235 September 22, 2005 Number 12
NextNext

Autoantibody Signatures in Prostate Cancer
Xiaoju Wang, Ph.D., Jianjun Yu, M.S., Arun Sreekumar, Ph.D., Sooryanarayana Varambally, Ph.D., Ronglai Shen, M.S., Donald Giacherio, Ph.D., Rohit Mehra, M.D., James E. Montie, M.D., Kenneth J. Pienta, M.D., Martin G. Sanda, M.D., Philip W. Kantoff, M.D., Mark A. Rubin, M.D., John T. Wei, M.D., Debashis Ghosh, Ph.D., and Arul M. Chinnaiyan, M.D., Ph.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set
-Supplementary Material

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Finn, O. J.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background New biomarkers, such as autoantibody signatures, may improve the early detection of prostate cancer.

Methods With a phage-display library derived from prostate-cancer tissue, we developed and used phage protein microarrays to analyze serum samples from 119 patients with prostate cancer and 138 controls, with the samples equally divided into training and validation sets. A phage-peptide detector that was constructed from the training set was evaluated on an independent validation set of 128 serum samples (60 from patients with prostate cancer and 68 from controls).

Results A 22-phage-peptide detector had 88.2 percent specificity (95 percent confidence interval, 0.78 to 0.95) and 81.6 percent sensitivity (95 percent confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.90) in discriminating between the group with prostate cancer and the control group. This panel of peptides performed better than did prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in distinguishing between the group with prostate cancer and the control group (area under the curve for the autoantibody signature, 0.93; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.88 to 0.97; area under the curve for PSA, 0.80; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.71 to 0.88). Logistic-regression analysis revealed that the phage-peptide panel provided additional discriminative power over PSA (P<0.001). Among the 22 phage peptides used as a detector, 4 were derived from in-frame, named coding sequences. The remaining phage peptides were generated from untranslated sequences.

Conclusions Autoantibodies against peptides derived from prostate-cancer tissue could be used as the basis for a screening test for prostate cancer.


Source Information

From the Departments of Pathology (X.W., J.Y., A.S., S.V., R.S., D. Giacherio, R.M., A.M.C.), Biostatistics (R.S., D. Ghosh), Urology (J.E.M., K.J.P., J.T.W., A.M.C.), and Internal Medicine (K.J.P.), and the Comprehensive Cancer Center (A.S., S.V., J.E.M., K.J.P., J.T.W., A.M.C.), University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor; and Beth Israel – Deaconess Medical Center (M.G.S.), Dana – Farber Cancer Institute (P.W.K.), and Brigham and Women's Hospital (M.A.R.), Harvard Medical School — all in Boston.

Drs. Wang and Yu contributed equally to this article.

Address reprint requests to Dr. Chinnaiyan at the Department of Pathology and Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, 1301 Catherine St., MSI 4237, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, or at arul{at}umich.edu.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Autoantibodies in Prostate Cancer
Tan E.M., Koziol J. A., Kida Y., Thorat M. A., Badwe R. A., Rocco B., Djavan B., de Cobelli O., Wang X., Ghosh D., Chinnaiyan A. M.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2005; 353:2815-2817, Dec 29, 2005. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.