The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Editorial
PreviousPrevious
Volume 353:2068-2070 November 10, 2005 Number 19
NextNext

Choosing the Best Prenatal Screening Protocol
Joe Leigh Simpson, M.D.

Since this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 100 words of the full text and any section headings.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Purchase this article

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-Related Article
 by Malone, F. D.
-PubMed Citation
Prenatal genetic diagnosis for numerical chromosomal abnormalities (aneuploidy) was once simple. In the 1970s, women who were at least 35 years of age at delivery were offered an invasive procedure, amniocentesis, and 25 to 30 percent of trisomy 21 pregnancies were diagnosed. In the 1980s, the approach to screening changed because of observations that relatively low levels of alpha-fetoprotein and unconjugated estriol and relatively high levels of human chorionic gonadotropin and, later, inhibin A in the maternal serum during the second trimester predicted the risk of fetal trisomy. This information, together with the age-specific risk of trisomy, permitted individual risks . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Source Information

From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.


This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.