The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Original Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 353:2433-2441 December 8, 2005 Number 23
NextNext

An Epidemic, Toxin Gene–Variant Strain of Clostridium difficile
L. Clifford McDonald, M.D., George E. Killgore, Dr.P.H., Angela Thompson, M.M.Sc., Robert C. Owens, Jr., Pharm.D., Sophia V. Kazakova, M.D., M.P.H., Ph.D., Susan P. Sambol, M.T., Stuart Johnson, M.D., and Dale N. Gerding, M.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-PowerPoint Slide Set

Commentary
-Editorial
 by Bartlett, J. G.
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background Recent reports suggest that the rate and severity of Clostridium difficile–associated disease in the United States are increasing and that the increase may be associated with the emergence of a new strain of C. difficile with increased virulence, resistance, or both.

Methods A total of 187 C. difficile isolates were collected from eight health care facilities in six states (Georgia, Illinois, Maine, New Jersey, Oregon, and Pennsylvania) in which outbreaks of C. difficile–associated disease had occurred between 2000 and 2003. The isolates were characterized by restriction-endonuclease analysis (REA), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and toxinotyping, and the results were compared with those from a database of more than 6000 isolates obtained before 2001. The polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the recently described binary toxin CDT and a deletion in the pathogenicity locus gene, tcdC, that might result in increased production of toxins A and B.

Results Isolates that belonged to one REA group (BI) and had the same PFGE type (NAP1) were identified in specimens collected from patients at all eight facilities and accounted for at least half of the isolates from five facilities. REA group BI, which was first identified in 1984, was uncommon among isolates from the historic database (14 cases). Both historic and current (obtained since 2001) BI/NAP1 isolates were of toxinotype III, were positive for the binary toxin CDT, and contained an 18-bp tcdC deletion. Resistance to gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin was more common in current BI/NAP1 isolates than in non-BI/NAP1 isolates (100 percent vs. 42 percent, P<0.001), whereas the rate of resistance to clindamycin was the same in the two groups (79 percent). All of the current but none of the historic BI/NAP1 isolates were resistant to gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin (P<0.001).

Conclusions A previously uncommon strain of C. difficile with variations in toxin genes has become more resistant to fluoroquinolones and has emerged as a cause of geographically dispersed outbreaks of C. difficile–associated disease.


Source Information

From the Epidemiology and Laboratory Branch, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta (L.C.M., G.E.K., A.T., S.V.K.); the Departments of Pharmacy and Infectious Diseases, Maine Medical Center, Portland (R.C.O.); the College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington (R.C.O.); and the Infectious Disease Section and Research Service, Department of Medicine, Hines Veterans Affairs Hospital and Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Hines, Ill. (S.P.S., S.J., D.N.G.).

Address reprint requests to Dr. McDonald at 1600 Clifton Rd., MS A35, Atlanta, GA 30333, or at cmcdonald1{at}cdc.gov.

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Epidemic Clostridium difficile
Musher D. M., Logan N., Mehendiratta V., Polk R. E., Oinonen M., Pakyz A., Wilcox M. H., Freeman J., Iwata K., Doi A., Furuya N., McDonald L. C., Gerding D. N., Loo V. G., Libman M. D., Dascal A.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2006; 354:1199-1203, Mar 16, 2006. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  TERMS OF USE  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.