The New England Journal of Medicine
e-mail icon  FREE NEJM E-TOC    HOME   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   CURRENT ISSUE   |   PAST ISSUES   |   COLLECTIONS   |    Advanced Search
Sign in | Get NEJM's E-Mail Table of Contents — Free | Subscribe
 
Special Article
PreviousPrevious
Volume 354:1147-1156 March 16, 2006 Number 11
NextNext

Who Is at Greatest Risk for Receiving Poor-Quality Health Care?
Steven M. Asch, M.D., M.P.H., Eve A. Kerr, M.D., M.P.H., Joan Keesey, B.A., John L. Adams, Ph.D., Claude M. Setodji, Ph.D., Shaista Malik, M.D., M.P.H., and Elizabeth A. McGlynn, Ph.D.

 Sign up for free e-toc
 

This Article
-Full Text
- PDF
-PDA Full Text
-Supplementary Material

Commentary
-Letters

Tools and Services
-Add to Personal Archive
-Add to Citation Manager
-Notify a Friend
-E-mail When Cited
-E-mail When Letters Appear

More Information
-PubMed Citation
ABSTRACT

Background American adults frequently do not receive recommended health care. The extent to which the quality of health care varies among sociodemographic groups is unknown.

Methods We used data from medical records and telephone interviews of a random sample of people living in 12 communities to assess the quality of care received by those who had made at least one visit to a health care provider during the previous two years. We constructed aggregate scores from 439 indicators of the quality of care for 30 chronic and acute conditions and for disease prevention. We estimated the rates at which members of different sociodemographic subgroups received recommended care, with adjustment for the number of chronic and acute conditions, use of health care services, and other sociodemographic characteristics.

Results Overall, participants received 54.9 percent of recommended care. Even after adjustment, there was only moderate variation in quality-of-care scores among sociodemographic subgroups. Women had higher overall scores than men (56.6 percent vs. 52.3 percent, P<0.001), and participants below the age of 31 years had higher scores than those over the age of 64 years (57.5 percent vs. 52.1 percent, P<0.001). Blacks (57.6 percent) and Hispanics (57.5 percent) had slightly higher scores than whites (54.1 percent, P<0.001 for both comparisons). Those with annual household incomes over $50,000 had higher scores than those with incomes of less than $15,000 (56.6 percent vs. 53.1 percent, P<0.001).

Conclusions The differences among sociodemographic subgroups in the observed quality of health care are small in comparison with the gap for each subgroup between observed and desirable quality of health care. Quality-improvement programs that focus solely on reducing disparities among sociodemographic subgroups may miss larger opportunities to improve care.


Source Information

From RAND Health, Santa Monica, Calif. (S.M.A., J.K., J.L.A., C.M.S., S.M., E.A.M.); the Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Health Care System and the Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA — both in Los Angeles (S.M.A.); the Veterans Affairs Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Health Care System, and the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School — both in Ann Arbor, Mich. (E.A.K.); and the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California, Irvine (S.M.).

Full Text of this Article


Related Letters:

Who Is at Greatest Risk for Receiving Poor-Quality Health Care?
Geiger H. J., Betancourt J. R., Williams D. R., Sherrick R., Sinsky C. A., Asch S. M., Kerr E. A., McGlynn E. A.
Extract | Full Text | PDF  
N Engl J Med 2006; 354:2617-2619, Jun 15, 2006. Correspondence

This article has been cited by other articles:



HOME  |  SUBSCRIBE  |  SEARCH  |  CURRENT ISSUE  |  PAST ISSUES  |  COLLECTIONS  |  PRIVACY  |  HELP  |  beta.nejm.org

Comments and questions? Please contact us.

The New England Journal of Medicine is owned, published, and copyrighted © 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.